The Relationship between Components of the Dynamic Strength Index and the Slope of the Force-Velocity Profile in the Loaded Countermovement Jump in Resistance-Trained Males and Females

Coleman Scheller, J. Peeler, Todd Duhamel, Stephen Cornish
{"title":"The Relationship between Components of the Dynamic Strength Index and the Slope of the Force-Velocity Profile in the Loaded Countermovement Jump in Resistance-Trained Males and Females","authors":"Coleman Scheller, J. Peeler, Todd Duhamel, Stephen Cornish","doi":"10.47206/ijsc.v3i1.199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the dynamic strength index (DSI) and the lower-body Force-velocity (F-v) profile. Eighty-six (n = 58 females) resistance-trained individuals were recruited to perform both the DSI and F-v profile testing protocols to evaluate this relationship, as well as relationships between the components that comprise each test.  Spearman correlations were calculated between DSI, F-v profile slope, countermovement jump (CMJ) peak force (PF), isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) PF, and CMJ peak velocity (PV) across a series of loading conditions from an unloaded CMJ to an additional 100% bodyweight (BW) CMJ condition.  No significant correlations (rs = 0.01; p > 0.05) were found between the DSI value and the F-v profile slope.  Significant correlations were found between the DSI and CMJ/IMTP PF (rs range = -0.63 to 0.22; p < 0.05) and between CMJ/IMTP PF and measures of CMJ PV (rs range = 0.45 to 0.73; p < 0.05) across the loading conditions.  Results suggest that the DSI is not correlated to the F-v profile slope. Two different means of evaluating muscular force in athletes are not correlated; we suggest that athletes require specific evaluations for specific performance characteristics when assessing muscular force.","PeriodicalId":170948,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Strength and Conditioning","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Strength and Conditioning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v3i1.199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the dynamic strength index (DSI) and the lower-body Force-velocity (F-v) profile. Eighty-six (n = 58 females) resistance-trained individuals were recruited to perform both the DSI and F-v profile testing protocols to evaluate this relationship, as well as relationships between the components that comprise each test.  Spearman correlations were calculated between DSI, F-v profile slope, countermovement jump (CMJ) peak force (PF), isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) PF, and CMJ peak velocity (PV) across a series of loading conditions from an unloaded CMJ to an additional 100% bodyweight (BW) CMJ condition.  No significant correlations (rs = 0.01; p > 0.05) were found between the DSI value and the F-v profile slope.  Significant correlations were found between the DSI and CMJ/IMTP PF (rs range = -0.63 to 0.22; p < 0.05) and between CMJ/IMTP PF and measures of CMJ PV (rs range = 0.45 to 0.73; p < 0.05) across the loading conditions.  Results suggest that the DSI is not correlated to the F-v profile slope. Two different means of evaluating muscular force in athletes are not correlated; we suggest that athletes require specific evaluations for specific performance characteristics when assessing muscular force.
动力强度指数各分量与阻力训练男女负重反向跳跃力-速度曲线斜率的关系
本研究的目的是评估动态强度指数(DSI)与下体力-速度(F-v)剖面之间的关系。我们招募了86名(n = 58名女性)接受过阻力训练的个体来执行DSI和F-v剖面测试方案,以评估这种关系,以及构成每个测试的组成部分之间的关系。计算了从卸载CMJ到附加100%体重(BW) CMJ的一系列加载条件下,DSI、F-v剖面斜率、反向跳跃(CMJ)峰值力(PF)、等距大腿中部拉力(IMTP) PF和CMJ峰值速度(PV)之间的Spearman相关性。无显著相关性(rs = 0.01;p > 0.05), DSI值与F-v剖面斜率之间存在显著性差异。DSI与CMJ/IMTP PF之间存在显著相关(rs范围= -0.63 ~ 0.22;p < 0.05), CMJ/IMTP PF与CMJ PV测量值之间(rs范围= 0.45 ~ 0.73;P < 0.05)。结果表明,DSI与F-v剖面斜率无关。两种不同的评估运动员肌肉力量的方法不相关;我们建议运动员在评估肌肉力量时需要对特定的表现特征进行特定的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信