Intrinsic Evaluation of Bangla Word Embeddings

Nafiz Sadman, Akib Sadmanee, Md. Iftekhar Tanveer, Md. Ashraful Amin, A. Ali
{"title":"Intrinsic Evaluation of Bangla Word Embeddings","authors":"Nafiz Sadman, Akib Sadmanee, Md. Iftekhar Tanveer, Md. Ashraful Amin, A. Ali","doi":"10.1109/ICBSLP47725.2019.201506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Word embeddings are vector representations of word that allow machines to learn semantic and syntactic meanings by performing computations on them. Two wellknown embedding models are CBOW and Skipgram. Different methods proposed to evaluate the quality of embeddings are categorized into extrinsic and intrinsic evaluation methods. This paper focuses on intrinsic evaluation - the evaluation of the models on tasks, such as analogy prediction, semantic relatedness, synonym detection, antonym detection and concept categorization. We present intrinsic evaluations on Bangla word embedding created using CBOW and Skipgram models on a Bangla corpus that we built. These are trained on more than 700,000 articles consisting of more than 1.3 million unique words with different embedding dimension sizes, e.g., 300, 100, 64, and 32. We created the evaluation datasets for the abovementioned tasks and performed a comprehensive evaluation. We observe, word vectors of dimension 300, produced using Skipgram models, achieves accuracy of 51.33% for analogy prediction, a correlation of 0.62 for semantic relatedness, and accuracy of 53.85% and 9.56% for synonym and antonym detection 9.56%. Finally, for concept categorization the accuracy is 91.02%. The corpus and evaluation datasets are made publicly available for further research.","PeriodicalId":413077,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Bangla Speech and Language Processing (ICBSLP)","volume":"19 10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Bangla Speech and Language Processing (ICBSLP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBSLP47725.2019.201506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Word embeddings are vector representations of word that allow machines to learn semantic and syntactic meanings by performing computations on them. Two wellknown embedding models are CBOW and Skipgram. Different methods proposed to evaluate the quality of embeddings are categorized into extrinsic and intrinsic evaluation methods. This paper focuses on intrinsic evaluation - the evaluation of the models on tasks, such as analogy prediction, semantic relatedness, synonym detection, antonym detection and concept categorization. We present intrinsic evaluations on Bangla word embedding created using CBOW and Skipgram models on a Bangla corpus that we built. These are trained on more than 700,000 articles consisting of more than 1.3 million unique words with different embedding dimension sizes, e.g., 300, 100, 64, and 32. We created the evaluation datasets for the abovementioned tasks and performed a comprehensive evaluation. We observe, word vectors of dimension 300, produced using Skipgram models, achieves accuracy of 51.33% for analogy prediction, a correlation of 0.62 for semantic relatedness, and accuracy of 53.85% and 9.56% for synonym and antonym detection 9.56%. Finally, for concept categorization the accuracy is 91.02%. The corpus and evaluation datasets are made publicly available for further research.
孟加拉语词嵌入的内在评价
词嵌入是词的向量表示,允许机器通过对其进行计算来学习语义和句法含义。两个著名的嵌入模型是CBOW和Skipgram。不同的嵌入质量评价方法分为外在评价法和内在评价法。本文的重点是内在评价,即模型在类比预测、语义关联、同义词检测、反义词检测和概念分类等任务上的评价。我们对使用CBOW和Skipgram模型在我们构建的孟加拉语语料库上创建的孟加拉语词嵌入进行了内在评估。这些算法在70多万篇文章上进行训练,这些文章由130多万个具有不同嵌入维度大小的唯一单词组成,例如300、100、64和32。我们创建了上述任务的评估数据集,并进行了全面的评估。我们观察到,使用Skipgram模型生成的300维词向量的类比预测准确率为51.33%,语义相关性相关性为0.62,同义词和反义词检测准确率分别为53.85%和9.56%。最后,对于概念分类,准确率为91.02%。语料库和评估数据集公开供进一步研究使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信