Introducing Digital Literacy Skills Through IBL: A Comparative Study of UG and PG Business Information Systems Students

Marie Griffiths, M. Kutar, J. Wood
{"title":"Introducing Digital Literacy Skills Through IBL: A Comparative Study of UG and PG Business Information Systems Students","authors":"Marie Griffiths, M. Kutar, J. Wood","doi":"10.11120/ital.2010.09020007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper reports a comparative study of Inquiry-Based Learning (IBL) at Undergraduate (UG) and Postgraduate (PG) levels at a university in the north west of England. Both student cohorts undertook a professional, legal and ethical module centred on IT. This study focuses on how the different student cohorts approached this style of teaching, and how it impacted on overall student engagement throughout the semester. IBL was introduced in the 2009–2010 academic years; to the UG students in the first semester and the PG students in the second semester. Key observations gained from the study were unexpected in that the UG level students fully embraced the IBL approach, they maintained a high attendance level throughout the semester, and all preliminary and formative assessment work/tasks were eagerly completed. Ultimately, this developed students’ information literacy skills. PG students enjoyed the in-class IBL activities, but actively avoided module preparation and formative assessment work/tasks, and so minimized their opportunities to develop rich digital literacy skills. This study highlights potential enablers required to employ IBL techniques successfully.","PeriodicalId":247470,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2010.09020007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract This paper reports a comparative study of Inquiry-Based Learning (IBL) at Undergraduate (UG) and Postgraduate (PG) levels at a university in the north west of England. Both student cohorts undertook a professional, legal and ethical module centred on IT. This study focuses on how the different student cohorts approached this style of teaching, and how it impacted on overall student engagement throughout the semester. IBL was introduced in the 2009–2010 academic years; to the UG students in the first semester and the PG students in the second semester. Key observations gained from the study were unexpected in that the UG level students fully embraced the IBL approach, they maintained a high attendance level throughout the semester, and all preliminary and formative assessment work/tasks were eagerly completed. Ultimately, this developed students’ information literacy skills. PG students enjoyed the in-class IBL activities, but actively avoided module preparation and formative assessment work/tasks, and so minimized their opportunities to develop rich digital literacy skills. This study highlights potential enablers required to employ IBL techniques successfully.
通过IBL引入数字素养技能:本科与本科商业信息系统专业学生的比较研究
摘要:本文报道了在英格兰西北部一所大学的本科(UG)和研究生(PG)水平的研究性学习(IBL)的比较研究。两组学生都参加了以IT为中心的专业、法律和道德模块。这项研究的重点是不同的学生群体如何采用这种教学方式,以及它如何影响整个学期的整体学生参与度。IBL在2009-2010学年推出;第一学期为UG,第二学期为PG。从研究中获得的主要观察结果是意想不到的,UG水平的学生完全接受了IBL方法,他们在整个学期保持了很高的出勤率,并且急切地完成了所有的初步和形成性评估工作/任务。最终,这培养了学生的信息素养技能。PG学生很享受课堂上的IBL活动,但积极回避模块准备和形成性评估工作/任务,从而最大限度地减少了他们培养丰富数字素养技能的机会。这项研究强调了成功使用IBL技术所需的潜在推动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信