Women and education: the right to substantive equality

S. Fredman
{"title":"Women and education: the right to substantive equality","authors":"S. Fredman","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781447337638.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter studies the right to substantive equality in education. The right to equality demands much more than parity for girls and boys in education. Simply requiring parity ignores the specifically gendered way in which inequality in education manifests itself. Instead, it is argued that the principle of substantive equality should be the framework for evaluating progress towards equality in education. The meaning of substantive equality remains somewhat contested, with some focusing on dignity, others on equality of opportunity, and still others on equality of results. Instead of reducing substantive equality to a single principle, it should be regarded as having four interconnected dimensions: redressing disadvantage (distributive dimension); addressing stigma, stereotyping, prejudice, and violence (recognition dimension); facilitating participation (participative dimension); and accommodating difference and achieving structural change (transformative dimension).","PeriodicalId":128042,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights and Equality in Education","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Rights and Equality in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447337638.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter studies the right to substantive equality in education. The right to equality demands much more than parity for girls and boys in education. Simply requiring parity ignores the specifically gendered way in which inequality in education manifests itself. Instead, it is argued that the principle of substantive equality should be the framework for evaluating progress towards equality in education. The meaning of substantive equality remains somewhat contested, with some focusing on dignity, others on equality of opportunity, and still others on equality of results. Instead of reducing substantive equality to a single principle, it should be regarded as having four interconnected dimensions: redressing disadvantage (distributive dimension); addressing stigma, stereotyping, prejudice, and violence (recognition dimension); facilitating participation (participative dimension); and accommodating difference and achieving structural change (transformative dimension).
妇女与教育:享有实质平等的权利
本章主要研究教育中的实质平等权利。平等权利所要求的远不只是男女教育平等。简单地要求平等忽略了教育不平等的具体性别表现方式。相反,有人认为,实质平等原则应作为评估教育平等进展的框架。实质性平等的意义仍然存在一些争议,一些人关注尊严,另一些人关注机会平等,还有一些人关注结果平等。不应将实质性平等简化为单一原则,而应将其视为具有四个相互联系的方面:纠正劣势(分配方面);解决污名化、陈规定型、偏见和暴力问题(承认层面);促进参与(参与层面);适应差异,实现结构变化(转型维度)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信