Filling the reality gap: Using obstacles to promote robust gaits in evolutionary robotics

K. Glette, Andreas Leret Johnsen, Eivind Samuelsen
{"title":"Filling the reality gap: Using obstacles to promote robust gaits in evolutionary robotics","authors":"K. Glette, Andreas Leret Johnsen, Eivind Samuelsen","doi":"10.1109/ICES.2014.7008738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In evolutionary robotics, which concerns automatic design of robotic systems using evolutionary algorithms, the well-known reality gap phenomenon occurs when transferring results from simulation to real world robots. Several approaches have been proposed to tackle this challenge, such as improving the simulator, avoiding poorly simulated solutions, or promoting robust controllers by introducing noise in the simulation. In this paper we investigate if the addition of a set of small obstacles in the simulated environment can help promote more robust gaits when transferred to a real world robot. In total 80 robot gaits are tested in the real world, evolved using flat and obstacle-seeded ground planes, and using two different scenario difficulties. The results show that in the baseline scenario the proposed obstacle method has little impact on the reality gap of the evolved gaits, whereas there is a significant reduction for the difficult scenario: The average real world performance ratio is 2.3 times higher than the result obtained with the flat plane, and there are no null-performing gaits.","PeriodicalId":432958,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE International Conference on Evolvable Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE International Conference on Evolvable Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICES.2014.7008738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In evolutionary robotics, which concerns automatic design of robotic systems using evolutionary algorithms, the well-known reality gap phenomenon occurs when transferring results from simulation to real world robots. Several approaches have been proposed to tackle this challenge, such as improving the simulator, avoiding poorly simulated solutions, or promoting robust controllers by introducing noise in the simulation. In this paper we investigate if the addition of a set of small obstacles in the simulated environment can help promote more robust gaits when transferred to a real world robot. In total 80 robot gaits are tested in the real world, evolved using flat and obstacle-seeded ground planes, and using two different scenario difficulties. The results show that in the baseline scenario the proposed obstacle method has little impact on the reality gap of the evolved gaits, whereas there is a significant reduction for the difficult scenario: The average real world performance ratio is 2.3 times higher than the result obtained with the flat plane, and there are no null-performing gaits.
填补现实差距:利用障碍促进进化机器人的稳健步态
在进化机器人技术中,使用进化算法对机器人系统进行自动设计,在将仿真结果转移到现实世界机器人时,会出现众所周知的现实差距现象。已经提出了几种方法来解决这一挑战,例如改进模拟器,避免模拟不佳的解决方案,或者通过在模拟中引入噪声来提高鲁棒控制器。在本文中,我们研究了在模拟环境中添加一组小障碍物是否有助于在转移到真实世界的机器人时促进更鲁棒的步态。总共有80个机器人的步态在现实世界中进行了测试,使用平坦和有障碍物的地面平面进行了进化,并使用了两种不同的场景难度。结果表明,在基线场景下,所提出的障碍物方法对进化步态的真实差距影响不大,而在困难场景下,所提出的障碍物方法对进化步态的真实差距影响明显减小:平均真实世界性能比在平面下获得的结果高2.3倍,并且没有零执行的步态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信