Rumor Remove Order Strategy on Social Networks

Yuanda Wang, Haibo Wang, Shigang Chen, Ye Xia
{"title":"Rumor Remove Order Strategy on Social Networks","authors":"Yuanda Wang, Haibo Wang, Shigang Chen, Ye Xia","doi":"10.1145/3471287.3471294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rumors are defined as widely spread talk with no reliable source to back it up. In modern society, the rumors are widely spreading on the social network. The spread of rumors poses great challenges for the society. A ”fake news” story can rile up your emotions and change your mood. Some rumors can even cause social panic and economic losses. As such, the influence of rumors can be far-reaching and long-lasting. Efficient and intelligent rumor control strategies are necessary to constrain the spread of rumors. Existing rumor control strategies are designed for controlling a single rumor. However, there are usually many rumors existing on social networks and only limited rumors can be removed at a time due to the limited detection capacity and CPU performance. Consequently, when dealing with multiple rumors, we should remove rumors in a certain order. We argue that the order of removing rumors matters as different rumors possess different properties, e.g., acceptance rate, propagation speed, etc. Unfortunately, to the best of our knowledge, there is no prior work on removing multiple rumors and the order of removing rumors. To this end, this paper proposes two novel rumor control strategies to remove the multiple rumors. We also extends the classical Susceptible Infected Recovered (SIR) model to simulate the dynamics of rumor propagation in a more practical manner. We evaluate the performance of strategies. The experiments show that our proposed rumor control strategies obviously outperform than benchmark strategy.","PeriodicalId":306474,"journal":{"name":"2021 the 5th International Conference on Information System and Data Mining","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 the 5th International Conference on Information System and Data Mining","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3471287.3471294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rumors are defined as widely spread talk with no reliable source to back it up. In modern society, the rumors are widely spreading on the social network. The spread of rumors poses great challenges for the society. A ”fake news” story can rile up your emotions and change your mood. Some rumors can even cause social panic and economic losses. As such, the influence of rumors can be far-reaching and long-lasting. Efficient and intelligent rumor control strategies are necessary to constrain the spread of rumors. Existing rumor control strategies are designed for controlling a single rumor. However, there are usually many rumors existing on social networks and only limited rumors can be removed at a time due to the limited detection capacity and CPU performance. Consequently, when dealing with multiple rumors, we should remove rumors in a certain order. We argue that the order of removing rumors matters as different rumors possess different properties, e.g., acceptance rate, propagation speed, etc. Unfortunately, to the best of our knowledge, there is no prior work on removing multiple rumors and the order of removing rumors. To this end, this paper proposes two novel rumor control strategies to remove the multiple rumors. We also extends the classical Susceptible Infected Recovered (SIR) model to simulate the dynamics of rumor propagation in a more practical manner. We evaluate the performance of strategies. The experiments show that our proposed rumor control strategies obviously outperform than benchmark strategy.
谣言移除社会网络上的订单策略
谣言被定义为没有可靠来源支持的广泛传播的谈话。在现代社会,谣言在社交网络上广泛传播。谣言的传播给社会带来了巨大的挑战。一个“假新闻”故事可以激怒你的情绪,改变你的情绪。一些谣言甚至会造成社会恐慌和经济损失。因此,谣言的影响可能是深远和持久的。有效、智能的谣言控制策略是遏制谣言传播的必要手段。现有的谣言控制策略都是针对单个谣言而设计的。然而,社交网络上通常存在许多谣言,由于检测能力和CPU性能的限制,一次只能去除有限的谣言。因此,在处理多重谣言时,我们应该按照一定的顺序去除谣言。我们认为去除谣言的顺序很重要,因为不同的谣言具有不同的性质,如接受率、传播速度等。不幸的是,据我们所知,目前还没有关于去除多个谣言和去除谣言的顺序的工作。为此,本文提出了两种新的谣言控制策略来消除多重谣言。我们还扩展了经典的易感感染恢复(SIR)模型,以更实际的方式模拟谣言传播的动态。我们评估策略的表现。实验表明,本文提出的谣言控制策略明显优于基准策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信