Identification and Classification of Driving-Related Stress Using Electrocardiogram and Skin Conductance Signals

Ilaria Marcantoni, Giorgia Barchiesi, Sofia Barchiesi, Caterina Belbusti, Chiara Leoni, Sofia Romagnoli, A. Sbrollini, M. Morettini, L. Burattini
{"title":"Identification and Classification of Driving-Related Stress Using Electrocardiogram and Skin Conductance Signals","authors":"Ilaria Marcantoni, Giorgia Barchiesi, Sofia Barchiesi, Caterina Belbusti, Chiara Leoni, Sofia Romagnoli, A. Sbrollini, M. Morettini, L. Burattini","doi":"10.1109/MeMeA54994.2022.9856418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of on-board car electronics for automatic stress level detection is becoming an area of great interest. The literature showed that biomedical signal acquisition could provide significant information. Skin conductance (SC) and electrocardiogram (ECG) have demonstrated to provide the most significant stress-related features. Thus, the aim of this study is the classification of three-level and binary stress, using a minimal combination of SC and ECG features. The “Stress Recognition in Automobile Drivers” database was used to test a procedure based on linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA). The database protocol includes three driving periods, corresponding to different levels of stress (low-medium-high). After data preprocessing, LDA and QDA three-level classifications were applied on all the extracted SC and ECG features to determine the best classification approach. Boruta algorithm allowed to select the most significant features for the classification. Then, the best classification approach was applied on this restricted set of features, performing both three-level (low vs medium vs high) and binary (high+medium vs low) stress classification. QDA was the most accurate classification method (accuracy: 96.0% for QDA vs 85.3% for LDA, considering all the features). QDA accuracy, considering only the selected features, was 86.7% for the three-level classification and 94.7% for the binary classification. This result represents an acceptable trade-off between classification accuracy and computational cost, associated to the number of considered features. In conclusion, ECG together with SC are suitable for the objective and automatic identification and classification of driving-related stress with a good accuracy.","PeriodicalId":106228,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA54994.2022.9856418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of on-board car electronics for automatic stress level detection is becoming an area of great interest. The literature showed that biomedical signal acquisition could provide significant information. Skin conductance (SC) and electrocardiogram (ECG) have demonstrated to provide the most significant stress-related features. Thus, the aim of this study is the classification of three-level and binary stress, using a minimal combination of SC and ECG features. The “Stress Recognition in Automobile Drivers” database was used to test a procedure based on linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA). The database protocol includes three driving periods, corresponding to different levels of stress (low-medium-high). After data preprocessing, LDA and QDA three-level classifications were applied on all the extracted SC and ECG features to determine the best classification approach. Boruta algorithm allowed to select the most significant features for the classification. Then, the best classification approach was applied on this restricted set of features, performing both three-level (low vs medium vs high) and binary (high+medium vs low) stress classification. QDA was the most accurate classification method (accuracy: 96.0% for QDA vs 85.3% for LDA, considering all the features). QDA accuracy, considering only the selected features, was 86.7% for the three-level classification and 94.7% for the binary classification. This result represents an acceptable trade-off between classification accuracy and computational cost, associated to the number of considered features. In conclusion, ECG together with SC are suitable for the objective and automatic identification and classification of driving-related stress with a good accuracy.
利用心电图和皮肤电导信号识别和分类驾驶相关应激
用于自动应力水平检测的车载电子设备的发展正成为一个非常感兴趣的领域。文献表明,生物医学信号采集可以提供重要的信息。皮肤电导(SC)和心电图(ECG)已被证明提供了最重要的压力相关特征。因此,本研究的目的是利用SC和ECG特征的最小组合对三级和二元应激进行分类。利用“汽车驾驶员应力识别”数据库,对基于线性判别分析(LDA)和二次判别分析(QDA)的应力识别程序进行了测试。数据库协议包括三个驱动周期,对应于不同的压力水平(低-中-高)。数据预处理后,对提取的所有SC和ECG特征进行LDA和QDA三级分类,确定最佳分类方法。Boruta算法允许选择最重要的特征进行分类。然后,将最佳分类方法应用于该受限特征集,执行三级(低、中、高)和二元(高+中、低)应力分类。考虑到所有特征,QDA是最准确的分类方法(准确率:QDA为96.0%,LDA为85.3%)。仅考虑所选特征时,三级分类的QDA准确率为86.7%,二元分类的准确率为94.7%。这个结果代表了分类精度和计算成本之间可接受的权衡,与考虑的特征数量相关。综上所述,ECG与SC相结合适用于驾驶相关应激的客观自动识别与分类,具有较好的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信