Two Verses of Dignity; the Study of Verses of Caliphate and Trust with the Criterion of Human Digninty

Seyed Abdosaleh Jafari, Seyed Abolhasan Navab, Bagher Talebi Darabi, Behin Arami Nia
{"title":"Two Verses of Dignity; the Study of Verses of Caliphate and Trust with the Criterion of Human Digninty","authors":"Seyed Abdosaleh Jafari, Seyed Abolhasan Navab, Bagher Talebi Darabi, Behin Arami Nia","doi":"10.18502/ijme.v15i7.11813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"”Koran” had affirmed “Human Dignity” but in other verse, it had mentioned “Caliphate/Substitution” and “Deposit” about human in comparison with other creatures that they had difficult and covered interpretations. “The choice of good and evil” as Human Dignity criterion, makes it easy and transparent. \n“Deposit” verse says Human accepts Deposit and others refuse it because of 2 adjectives: “Zaloom” and “Jahool” from roots of oppression and ignorance. Interpretations are different in meaning this adjective and their relation to deposit. If deposit is choosing, it can make oppression and justice and knowledge and ignorance. Then “FAOOL” structure in Arabic can show potency of action/adjective. Thus, they mean potent for oppression and ignorance like justice and knowledge. It means choosing potency, not actual ugliness. \nIn “Caliphate” verse, angels say to God that Human creation tend to corruption and killing. God hadn’t refused it but had referred to an upper knowledge. If Caliphate is good choosing too along justice and knowledge, angels had seen properly contemporaneous ignorance and oppression and corruption and killing but they couldn’t recognize the difference between good free discretion and their algebraic goodness that is caliphate and moral similarity and free worship of God with Lordship essence.","PeriodicalId":377993,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijme.v15i7.11813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

”Koran” had affirmed “Human Dignity” but in other verse, it had mentioned “Caliphate/Substitution” and “Deposit” about human in comparison with other creatures that they had difficult and covered interpretations. “The choice of good and evil” as Human Dignity criterion, makes it easy and transparent. “Deposit” verse says Human accepts Deposit and others refuse it because of 2 adjectives: “Zaloom” and “Jahool” from roots of oppression and ignorance. Interpretations are different in meaning this adjective and their relation to deposit. If deposit is choosing, it can make oppression and justice and knowledge and ignorance. Then “FAOOL” structure in Arabic can show potency of action/adjective. Thus, they mean potent for oppression and ignorance like justice and knowledge. It means choosing potency, not actual ugliness. In “Caliphate” verse, angels say to God that Human creation tend to corruption and killing. God hadn’t refused it but had referred to an upper knowledge. If Caliphate is good choosing too along justice and knowledge, angels had seen properly contemporaneous ignorance and oppression and corruption and killing but they couldn’t recognize the difference between good free discretion and their algebraic goodness that is caliphate and moral similarity and free worship of God with Lordship essence.
尊严的两句诗;以人的尊严为标准研究哈里发与信任的诗篇
《古兰经》肯定了“人的尊严”,但在另一节经文中,它提到了“哈里发/替代”和“存款”,关于人类与其他生物的比较,它们有困难和隐蔽的解释。“善与恶的选择”作为人类尊严的标准,使其变得容易和透明。“存款”的诗句说,人类接受存款,而其他人拒绝,因为两个形容词:“Zaloom”和“Jahool”来自压迫和无知的根源。不同的解释在这个形容词的意义和它们与存款的关系上是不同的。如果沉淀是选择,它可以使压迫与正义、知识与无知分离。那么阿拉伯语中的“FAOOL”结构可以表示动作/形容词的效力。因此,它们意味着压迫和无知的力量,就像正义和知识一样。这意味着选择效力,而不是真正的丑陋。在“哈里发”的诗句中,天使对上帝说,人类的创造倾向于腐败和杀戮。上帝并没有拒绝它,而是提到了更高的知识。如果哈里发政权是好的选择,正义和知识,天使已经正确地看到了同时代的无知,压迫,腐败和杀戮,但他们无法认识到好的自由裁量权和他们的代数善良之间的区别,即哈里发政权和道德相似性以及对上帝的自由崇拜与领主本质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信