Mechanisms for Objectivity Ensuring and Fraud Prevention in the Online Academic Assessment

C. Glava
{"title":"Mechanisms for Objectivity Ensuring and Fraud Prevention in the Online Academic Assessment","authors":"C. Glava","doi":"10.24193/ed21.2022.23.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent online teaching experience we all were forced into during the pandemic period made us reflect on the existing teaching practices and their efficacy, while imposing on finding new ways, roles and functions for the classical teaching, learning and assessment activity. Academic assessment in particular proved to be a challenge in the sense that new and unexpected isses had to be managed. While the use of digital platforms offered support for new assessment and evaluation strategies, including improved feedback and ways of tracking students’ development, sensitive issues such as that of avoiding exam fraud risks, and the need for improving evaluation validity and authenticity appeared. The present paper offers an insight on university students’ and teachers’ perception on academic assessment, its added value and risks. It also provides some empirical proves for the need of integrating valuable lessons from the online evaluation experience and transfer them in hybrid and onsite academic education process.","PeriodicalId":116937,"journal":{"name":"Educatia 21","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educatia 21","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/ed21.2022.23.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recent online teaching experience we all were forced into during the pandemic period made us reflect on the existing teaching practices and their efficacy, while imposing on finding new ways, roles and functions for the classical teaching, learning and assessment activity. Academic assessment in particular proved to be a challenge in the sense that new and unexpected isses had to be managed. While the use of digital platforms offered support for new assessment and evaluation strategies, including improved feedback and ways of tracking students’ development, sensitive issues such as that of avoiding exam fraud risks, and the need for improving evaluation validity and authenticity appeared. The present paper offers an insight on university students’ and teachers’ perception on academic assessment, its added value and risks. It also provides some empirical proves for the need of integrating valuable lessons from the online evaluation experience and transfer them in hybrid and onsite academic education process.
网络学术评估客观性保障与舞弊防范机制研究
新冠肺炎疫情期间,我们都被迫进行了在线教学,这让我们在反思现有教学实践及其效果的同时,也要求我们为传统的教、学、评活动寻找新的方式、新的角色和新的功能。学术评价尤其证明是一项挑战,因为必须处理新的和意想不到的问题。虽然数字平台的使用为新的评估和评估策略提供了支持,包括改进反馈和跟踪学生发展的方法,但避免考试作弊风险、提高评估有效性和真实性的需求等敏感问题也出现了。本文分析了大学生和教师对学业评价的认知、学业评价的附加价值和风险。同时也为整合在线评价经验中的宝贵经验,并将其运用到混合式和现场学术教育过程中提供了一些实证证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信