Which Shot of Justice?

Ali Mehdi
{"title":"Which Shot of Justice?","authors":"Ali Mehdi","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199490592.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter undertakes a critical assessment of five Indian policies pertaining to children and claims of equality of resources (opportunities) and outcomes from the perspective of theoretical and empirical discussions in the previous chapters. As far as the policies are concerned, they have largely focused on equality of resources, predominantly with reference to health care and early nutrition. Despite showing some promise, they have ended up in timidity as far as their conceptualization and operationalization of equity is concerned. The chapter goes on to discuss the relevance of Amartya Sen’s ‘multifocal variable’, and although it seems that Sen would call for equality of capabilities, he does not. Instead, he argues against ‘absolute priority’ to any ‘unifocal criterion’ and in favor of equity considerations being broad, inclusive and multidimensional. It ends with the implications of discussions in the book for the equalisandum debate in political philosophy and for affirmative action policies.","PeriodicalId":247677,"journal":{"name":"A Shot of Justice","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A Shot of Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199490592.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter undertakes a critical assessment of five Indian policies pertaining to children and claims of equality of resources (opportunities) and outcomes from the perspective of theoretical and empirical discussions in the previous chapters. As far as the policies are concerned, they have largely focused on equality of resources, predominantly with reference to health care and early nutrition. Despite showing some promise, they have ended up in timidity as far as their conceptualization and operationalization of equity is concerned. The chapter goes on to discuss the relevance of Amartya Sen’s ‘multifocal variable’, and although it seems that Sen would call for equality of capabilities, he does not. Instead, he argues against ‘absolute priority’ to any ‘unifocal criterion’ and in favor of equity considerations being broad, inclusive and multidimensional. It ends with the implications of discussions in the book for the equalisandum debate in political philosophy and for affirmative action policies.
哪一种正义?
本章从前几章的理论和实证讨论的角度,对印度有关儿童和资源(机会)平等要求的五项政策和结果进行了批判性评估。就政策而言,它们主要侧重于资源平等,主要涉及保健和早期营养。尽管显示出一些希望,但就公平的概念化和操作化而言,它们最终还是胆怯了。本章继续讨论Amartya Sen的“多焦点变量”的相关性,尽管看起来Sen会呼吁能力平等,但他没有。相反,他反对任何“统一标准”的“绝对优先”,而赞成广泛、包容和多方面的公平考虑。它以书中讨论的政治哲学中的平等辩论和平权行动政策的含义结束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信