Recognition, Transformation, and Critical Intellectual History: A Reply to Honneth’s Recognition: A Chapter in the History of Ideas

IF 0.3
W. Levine
{"title":"Recognition, Transformation, and Critical Intellectual History: A Reply to Honneth’s Recognition: A Chapter in the History of Ideas","authors":"W. Levine","doi":"10.1163/22130624-20220006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article critically responds to Axel Honneth’s Recognition: A Chapter in the History of Ideas. It argues that, although Recognition provides a compelling historical investigation into the history of the concept of recognition as it emerged in modern France, Great Britain, and Germany, Honneth’s text retains some questionable methodological commitments that undermine its more provocative and potentially wide-ranging contributions. This article interrogates these commitments in addition to some of Honneth’s more specific arguments to speculate about other lessons that Honneth’s history of recognition can provide.","PeriodicalId":227091,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for History, Culture and Modernity","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for History, Culture and Modernity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22130624-20220006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article critically responds to Axel Honneth’s Recognition: A Chapter in the History of Ideas. It argues that, although Recognition provides a compelling historical investigation into the history of the concept of recognition as it emerged in modern France, Great Britain, and Germany, Honneth’s text retains some questionable methodological commitments that undermine its more provocative and potentially wide-ranging contributions. This article interrogates these commitments in addition to some of Honneth’s more specific arguments to speculate about other lessons that Honneth’s history of recognition can provide.
认识、转变与批判思想史:对霍尼斯《认识:思想史中的一章》的回答
本文对阿克塞尔·霍尼特的《认识:思想史中的一章》作了批判性的回应。它认为,尽管《承认》对现代法国、英国和德国出现的承认概念的历史进行了引人注目的历史调查,但Honneth的文本保留了一些可疑的方法论承诺,这些承诺破坏了其更具挑衅性和潜在广泛的贡献。本文除了探讨Honneth的一些更具体的论点外,还探讨了这些承诺,以推测Honneth的认识历史可以提供的其他教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书