Zappers, Phantomware and Other Sales Suppression Software in the State of Washington

R. T. Ainsworth, Robert Chicoine
{"title":"Zappers, Phantomware and Other Sales Suppression Software in the State of Washington","authors":"R. T. Ainsworth, Robert Chicoine","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3212292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electronic sales suppression (ESS) is a fraud that has been a (prominent) feature of the North American retail business since at least 1996. The first EES case in the US dates from 1981. ESS is a global problem. Depending on the jurisdiction, and the research study consulted, ESS is estimated to be present in 34% (of Canadian), 50% (of German – two studies), and 70% (of Swedish and Slovenian) businesses. It may be the case today, that “you cannot leave home without” encountering (or participating in) ESS. \nThe most common types of sales suppression technology are Zappers and Phantomware programming. In some instances, sales suppression is a personal (hands-on) service offered by installers or ECR/POS sales representatives. This is Sales Suppression as a Service or SSaaS. Recently suppression has entered the Dark Cloud, a fully automated manipulation of sales data that (physically) takes place off shore and uses internet-based data transfers. \nThe common solution in all cases is digital security, or fighting technology with technology. In the US, ESS has funded common criminals, organized crime syndicates, foreign and domestic terrorist organizations. US suppression cases have involved celebrity chefs, sitting members of Congress, the funding arm of Hezbollah, popular grocery store chains, restaurants, bars/ strip clubs, and small owner-operated pizza parlors. The technological response in the US has been weak. For some reason, the US has been very slow in taking up the technology-with-technology fight. \nGiven that the State of Washington collects 47.3% of its revenue (not including local government taxes) from the retail sales tax, and that technology has been the backbone of the State’s economy for years, it is only natural that Washington would take a US leadership position in this effort. Washington still trails by a wide margin the international efforts. The US has a lot to learn from jurisdictions like Belgium, Brazil, Canada (notably the provinces of Quebec and Ontario), China, Croatia, Italy, Russia, Rwanda, Sweden, and by January 1, 2 each of the members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Qatar and Kuwait).","PeriodicalId":409545,"journal":{"name":"EduRN: Economics Education (ERN) (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EduRN: Economics Education (ERN) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3212292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Electronic sales suppression (ESS) is a fraud that has been a (prominent) feature of the North American retail business since at least 1996. The first EES case in the US dates from 1981. ESS is a global problem. Depending on the jurisdiction, and the research study consulted, ESS is estimated to be present in 34% (of Canadian), 50% (of German – two studies), and 70% (of Swedish and Slovenian) businesses. It may be the case today, that “you cannot leave home without” encountering (or participating in) ESS. The most common types of sales suppression technology are Zappers and Phantomware programming. In some instances, sales suppression is a personal (hands-on) service offered by installers or ECR/POS sales representatives. This is Sales Suppression as a Service or SSaaS. Recently suppression has entered the Dark Cloud, a fully automated manipulation of sales data that (physically) takes place off shore and uses internet-based data transfers. The common solution in all cases is digital security, or fighting technology with technology. In the US, ESS has funded common criminals, organized crime syndicates, foreign and domestic terrorist organizations. US suppression cases have involved celebrity chefs, sitting members of Congress, the funding arm of Hezbollah, popular grocery store chains, restaurants, bars/ strip clubs, and small owner-operated pizza parlors. The technological response in the US has been weak. For some reason, the US has been very slow in taking up the technology-with-technology fight. Given that the State of Washington collects 47.3% of its revenue (not including local government taxes) from the retail sales tax, and that technology has been the backbone of the State’s economy for years, it is only natural that Washington would take a US leadership position in this effort. Washington still trails by a wide margin the international efforts. The US has a lot to learn from jurisdictions like Belgium, Brazil, Canada (notably the provinces of Quebec and Ontario), China, Croatia, Italy, Russia, Rwanda, Sweden, and by January 1, 2 each of the members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Qatar and Kuwait).
Zappers, Phantomware和其他销售抑制软件在华盛顿州
电子销售抑制(ESS)是一种欺诈行为,至少自1996年以来一直是北美零售业的一个(突出)特征。美国的第一例EES病例可以追溯到1981年。ESS是一个全球性问题。根据不同的司法管辖区和研究咨询,ESS估计存在于34%(加拿大),50%(德国-两项研究)和70%(瑞典和斯洛文尼亚)的企业中。今天的情况可能是,“你不能离开家”没有遇到(或参与)ESS。最常见的销售抑制技术类型是Zappers和Phantomware编程。在某些情况下,销售抑制是由安装人员或ECR/POS销售代表提供的个人(亲自)服务。这就是销售抑制即服务(SSaaS)。最近,“压制”进入了“黑云”,这是一种完全自动化的销售数据操纵,(物理上)发生在离岸,并使用基于互联网的数据传输。在所有情况下,通用的解决方案是数字安全,或者以技术对抗技术。在美国,ESS为普通罪犯、有组织犯罪集团、国内外恐怖组织提供资金。美国的镇压案件涉及名厨、现任国会议员、真主党的资助部门、受欢迎的连锁杂货店、餐馆、酒吧/脱衣舞俱乐部和小型业主经营的披萨店。美国的技术反应一直很弱。出于某种原因,美国在技术与技术的斗争中一直非常缓慢。考虑到华盛顿州47.3%的财政收入(不包括地方政府税收)来自零售销售税,而且多年来科技一直是该州经济的支柱,华盛顿在这一努力中占据美国的领导地位是很自然的。华盛顿仍然远远落后于国际社会的努力。美国有很多东西需要向比利时、巴西、加拿大(尤其是魁北克省和安大略省)、中国、克罗地亚、意大利、俄罗斯、卢旺达、瑞典以及海湾合作委员会(Gulf Cooperation Council)的每个成员国(阿拉伯联合酋长国、巴林、沙特阿拉伯、阿曼、卡塔尔和科威特)等司法管辖区学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信