The Mother Tongue in the Foreign Language: An Account of Russian L2 Learners' Error Incidence on Output.

Rafael Filiberto Forteza Fernández, L. Korneeva
{"title":"The Mother Tongue in the Foreign Language: An Account of Russian L2 Learners' Error Incidence on Output.","authors":"Rafael Filiberto Forteza Fernández, L. Korneeva","doi":"10.15405/EJSBS.210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on Selinker’s hypothesis of five psycholinguistic processes shaping interlanguage (1972), the paper focuses attention on the Russian L2-learners’ overreliance on the L1 as the main factor hindering their development. The research problem is, therefore, the high incidence of L1 transfer in the spoken and written English language output of Russian learners as an EFL issue largely ignored, and the research question, how much these learners’ dependence on the L1 affect their interlanguage (IL) development. The objectives are to offer an account of Russian L2 learners’ interlingual error incidence in free output, the L2 areas these error affects the most, and the effect of non-traditional remedial work in IL development. Thirty students out of a cohort of 123 were chosen for the study because of their little progress in the FL and later divided into two groups depending on their time of English-only L2 instruction. Their L2 spoken and written samples were used to determine their communication strategies and the output areas they affect the most. The study shows that time under L2-learning through the L2 does not modify significantly the students learning and communication strategies historically acquired through transfer of learning. The comparison with similar data from Spanish-speaking students, classroom observation, and introspection reveal the students use three L1based strategies to cope with L2 communication demands. These strategies are so closely connected with their beliefs and language practices that non-traditional remedial work is ineffective unless the students understand the nature of their problems and willingly engage in overcoming them. © 2017 Published by Future Academy www.FutureAcademy.org.uk ∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +0-000-000-0000 ; fax: +0-000-000-0000 . E-mail address: rafaelforteza@gmail.com http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/ejsbs.210 eISSN: 2301-2218 / Corresponding Author: Rafael Filiberto Forteza Fernandez Selection & Peer-review under responsibility of the Editors 2363","PeriodicalId":164632,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15405/EJSBS.210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Based on Selinker’s hypothesis of five psycholinguistic processes shaping interlanguage (1972), the paper focuses attention on the Russian L2-learners’ overreliance on the L1 as the main factor hindering their development. The research problem is, therefore, the high incidence of L1 transfer in the spoken and written English language output of Russian learners as an EFL issue largely ignored, and the research question, how much these learners’ dependence on the L1 affect their interlanguage (IL) development. The objectives are to offer an account of Russian L2 learners’ interlingual error incidence in free output, the L2 areas these error affects the most, and the effect of non-traditional remedial work in IL development. Thirty students out of a cohort of 123 were chosen for the study because of their little progress in the FL and later divided into two groups depending on their time of English-only L2 instruction. Their L2 spoken and written samples were used to determine their communication strategies and the output areas they affect the most. The study shows that time under L2-learning through the L2 does not modify significantly the students learning and communication strategies historically acquired through transfer of learning. The comparison with similar data from Spanish-speaking students, classroom observation, and introspection reveal the students use three L1based strategies to cope with L2 communication demands. These strategies are so closely connected with their beliefs and language practices that non-traditional remedial work is ineffective unless the students understand the nature of their problems and willingly engage in overcoming them. © 2017 Published by Future Academy www.FutureAcademy.org.uk ∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +0-000-000-0000 ; fax: +0-000-000-0000 . E-mail address: rafaelforteza@gmail.com http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/ejsbs.210 eISSN: 2301-2218 / Corresponding Author: Rafael Filiberto Forteza Fernandez Selection & Peer-review under responsibility of the Editors 2363
外语中的母语:对俄语第二语言学习者输出错误发生率的分析。
基于Selinker关于中介语形成的五种心理语言过程的假设(1972),本文关注了俄语l2学习者对L1的过度依赖是阻碍其发展的主要因素。因此,本研究的问题是,俄语学习者的英语口语和书面语言输出中高发生率的母语迁移问题在很大程度上被忽视,而本研究的问题是,这些学习者对母语的依赖在多大程度上影响了他们的中介语发展。本研究的目的是提供俄语第二语言学习者在自由输出中的语际错误发生率,这些错误影响最大的第二语言领域,以及非传统补救工作在外语发展中的作用。从123名学生中选出30名学生进行研究,因为他们在外语方面进展甚微,然后根据他们只接受英语的第二语言教学的时间分成两组。他们的第二语言口语和书面样本被用来确定他们的沟通策略和他们影响最大的输出领域。研究表明,通过第二语言学习的时间对学生通过学习迁移而习得的学习和交际策略没有显著的影响。通过与讲西班牙语的学生、课堂观察和自省的类似数据的比较,我们发现学生使用三种基于外语的策略来应对外语交际需求。这些策略与他们的信仰和语言实践密切相关,除非学生了解问题的本质并愿意克服这些问题,否则非传统的补救工作是无效的。©2017由未来学院出版www.FutureAcademy.org.uk *通讯作者。电话:+0-000-000-0000;传真:+0-000-000-0000。电子邮件地址:rafaelforteza@gmail.com http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/ejsbs.210 eISSN: 2301-2218 /通讯作者:Rafael Filiberto Forteza Fernandez 2363编辑负责遴选与同行评议
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信