Agresivitas Pajak dan Kecurangan AkuntansiAgresivitas Pajak dan Kecurangan Akuntansi

Suci Ardiryanti, Herlina Helmy, Erly Mulyani
{"title":"Agresivitas Pajak dan Kecurangan AkuntansiAgresivitas Pajak dan Kecurangan Akuntansi","authors":"Suci Ardiryanti, Herlina Helmy, Erly Mulyani","doi":"10.24036/jea.v4i1.448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to examine the tax aggressiveness relationship accounting fraud. This study uses the Beneish M Score Model to detecting accounting fraud and then measured by a dummy variable. The tax aggressiveness variable measured using five proxies including, Effective Tax Rate (ETR1, ETR2, ETR3, ETR4) and Book Tax Differences (BTD).  The study population was manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2013-2017. The study sample was determined by purposive sampling, so that 53 samples of manufacturing companies were obtained. Based on panel data regression analysis, the result show that of the five proxies used to measure tax aggressiveness, only ETR4 had a significant positive related to accounting fraud. While ETR1, ETR2, and ETR3 have an insignificant negative related to accounting fraud, and BTD is positive related to accounting fraud but not significant. The conclusion of this study is that tax aggressiveness are not positively related significantly with accounting fraud so the hypothesis is rejected.","PeriodicalId":103854,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL EKSPLORASI AKUNTANSI","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL EKSPLORASI AKUNTANSI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24036/jea.v4i1.448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to examine the tax aggressiveness relationship accounting fraud. This study uses the Beneish M Score Model to detecting accounting fraud and then measured by a dummy variable. The tax aggressiveness variable measured using five proxies including, Effective Tax Rate (ETR1, ETR2, ETR3, ETR4) and Book Tax Differences (BTD).  The study population was manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2013-2017. The study sample was determined by purposive sampling, so that 53 samples of manufacturing companies were obtained. Based on panel data regression analysis, the result show that of the five proxies used to measure tax aggressiveness, only ETR4 had a significant positive related to accounting fraud. While ETR1, ETR2, and ETR3 have an insignificant negative related to accounting fraud, and BTD is positive related to accounting fraud but not significant. The conclusion of this study is that tax aggressiveness are not positively related significantly with accounting fraud so the hypothesis is rejected.
税收侵略性和欺诈会计会计行为
本研究旨在探讨税务侵略性与会计舞弊的关系。本研究使用贝尼什M分数模型来检测会计舞弊,然后用一个虚拟变量来衡量。税收侵略性变量使用五个代理测量,包括有效税率(ETR1, ETR2, ETR3, ETR4)和账面税收差异(BTD)。研究对象是2013-2017年在印尼证券交易所上市的制造业公司。采用目的抽样法确定研究样本,共获得53家制造企业样本。基于面板数据回归分析,结果表明,在用于衡量税收侵略性的五个代理中,只有ETR4与会计欺诈具有显著的正相关。ETR1、ETR2、ETR3与会计舞弊负相关不显著,BTD与会计舞弊正相关但不显著。本研究的结论是,税收侵略性与会计欺诈没有显著的正相关,因此假设被驳回。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信