Russia: Russia’s response to terrorism in the twenty-first century

E. Stepanova
{"title":"Russia: Russia’s response to terrorism in the twenty-first century","authors":"E. Stepanova","doi":"10.7228/manchester/9781526105813.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter explores how, despite earlier counterterrorism failures and two bitter wars in Chechnya, terrorism in Russia has declined in the 2010s. The Islamist-separatist terrorism problem that used to dominate national politics was degraded to a relatively peripheral issue that hovers at a level of persistent, but low-scale and increasingly fragmented violence, primarily in the North Caucasus. However imperfect, interim and incomplete, a ‘solution’ that has worked out in the Russian case was not ‘war’. This ‘solution other than war’ was made possible by certain developments outside Moscow’s direct control, such as the internal split within the insurgency catalyzed by its increasing jihadization, and resulted from a combination of the policy of Chechenization, shifts in federal security strategy towards smarter suppression and prevention, and massive reconstruction and development assistance. While this solution is no substitute for addressing the underlying structural causes of violent extremism and has involved enormous security, financial, human rights and governance costs for the nation, these costs are much lower than the cost of war. This is seen as one of the key broader lessons to be gleaned from Russia’s response to terrorism. It also explains why Russia has a genuine interest in ensuring that this degree of stabilization and decline in terrorism of North Caucasian origin is not distorted or reversed by new destabilizing factors, including transnational influences and connections.","PeriodicalId":308143,"journal":{"name":"Non-Western responses to terrorism","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Non-Western responses to terrorism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9781526105813.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The chapter explores how, despite earlier counterterrorism failures and two bitter wars in Chechnya, terrorism in Russia has declined in the 2010s. The Islamist-separatist terrorism problem that used to dominate national politics was degraded to a relatively peripheral issue that hovers at a level of persistent, but low-scale and increasingly fragmented violence, primarily in the North Caucasus. However imperfect, interim and incomplete, a ‘solution’ that has worked out in the Russian case was not ‘war’. This ‘solution other than war’ was made possible by certain developments outside Moscow’s direct control, such as the internal split within the insurgency catalyzed by its increasing jihadization, and resulted from a combination of the policy of Chechenization, shifts in federal security strategy towards smarter suppression and prevention, and massive reconstruction and development assistance. While this solution is no substitute for addressing the underlying structural causes of violent extremism and has involved enormous security, financial, human rights and governance costs for the nation, these costs are much lower than the cost of war. This is seen as one of the key broader lessons to be gleaned from Russia’s response to terrorism. It also explains why Russia has a genuine interest in ensuring that this degree of stabilization and decline in terrorism of North Caucasian origin is not distorted or reversed by new destabilizing factors, including transnational influences and connections.
俄罗斯:俄罗斯在21世纪对恐怖主义的回应
这一章探讨了尽管早期的反恐失败和车臣的两场激烈战争,俄罗斯的恐怖主义在2010年代是如何下降的。过去主导国家政治的伊斯兰分裂主义恐怖主义问题已经退化为一个相对次要的问题,主要在北高加索地区,在持续的、小规模的、日益分散的暴力水平上徘徊。无论多么不完美、临时和不完整,在俄罗斯问题上找到的“解决方案”并不是“战争”。这种“战争之外的解决方案”是由于莫斯科直接控制之外的某些发展而成为可能的,例如由于其日益加剧的圣战化而催化的叛乱内部分裂,这是由车臣化政策,联邦安全战略转向更明智的镇压和预防以及大规模重建和发展援助的结合造成的。虽然这一解决方案不能替代解决暴力极端主义的根本结构性原因,并涉及国家的巨大安全、财政、人权和治理成本,但这些成本远低于战争成本。这被视为俄罗斯应对恐怖主义的重要经验之一。这也解释了为什么俄罗斯真正有兴趣确保这种程度的稳定和北高加索起源的恐怖主义的减少不会被新的不稳定因素扭曲或逆转,包括跨国影响和联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信