Effectiveness of different endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis: an ex vivo study.

F. Pedro, L. F. Nunes, Thiago Machado Pereira, Kellin Pivatto, C. Estrela, Octávio Amezcua, Á. Borges
{"title":"Effectiveness of different endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis: an ex vivo study.","authors":"F. Pedro, L. F. Nunes, Thiago Machado Pereira, Kellin Pivatto, C. Estrela, Octávio Amezcua, Á. Borges","doi":"10.19177/jrd.v6e5201898-103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of different endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212).Methods: Seventy bovine mandibular incisors were prepared, inoculated with a bacterial strain for 60 days and divided into the following groups: positive control; negative control; 2.5% NaOCl; 17% EDTA; 0.2% chitosan; 2.5% NaOCl + 0.2% chitosan; and 2.5% NaOCl + 17% EDTA. The irrigation protocol was performed using an experimental peristaltic pump device, with the irrigating solutions circulating within the apparatus at a constant flow for 10 min. Paper-point samples were then collected from the root canals and immersed in 7 mL of brain heart infusion broth, followed by incubation at 37°C for 48 h. Bacterial growth was assessed by turbidity of the culture medium.Results: E. faecalis was present in all samples after the use of different irrigants.Conclusion: The different irrigants tested were not effective in completely eliminating dentin bacterial contamination with E. faecalis.","PeriodicalId":213881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Dentistry","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19177/jrd.v6e5201898-103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of different endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212).Methods: Seventy bovine mandibular incisors were prepared, inoculated with a bacterial strain for 60 days and divided into the following groups: positive control; negative control; 2.5% NaOCl; 17% EDTA; 0.2% chitosan; 2.5% NaOCl + 0.2% chitosan; and 2.5% NaOCl + 17% EDTA. The irrigation protocol was performed using an experimental peristaltic pump device, with the irrigating solutions circulating within the apparatus at a constant flow for 10 min. Paper-point samples were then collected from the root canals and immersed in 7 mL of brain heart infusion broth, followed by incubation at 37°C for 48 h. Bacterial growth was assessed by turbidity of the culture medium.Results: E. faecalis was present in all samples after the use of different irrigants.Conclusion: The different irrigants tested were not effective in completely eliminating dentin bacterial contamination with E. faecalis.
不同牙髓冲洗剂对抗粪肠球菌的有效性:一项离体研究。
目的:评价不同根管冲洗剂对粪肠球菌(ATCC 29212)的治疗效果。方法:制备70只牛下颌骨切牙,接种菌株60 d,分为阳性对照组;消极的控制;NaOCl 2.5%;17% EDTA;0.2%壳聚糖;2.5% NaOCl + 0.2%壳聚糖;2.5% NaOCl + 17% EDTA。冲洗方案采用实验性蠕动泵装置,冲洗液在装置内恒流循环10分钟。然后从根管中收集纸点样本,浸入7 mL脑心灌注肉汤中,在37℃下孵育48小时。通过培养基的浊度评估细菌生长情况。结果:使用不同灌洗液后,所有标本中均有粪肠杆菌。结论:不同的冲洗液均不能完全清除粪肠杆菌对牙本质的污染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信