An approach to class diagrams verification according to SOLID design principles

Elena Chebanyuk, K. Markov
{"title":"An approach to class diagrams verification according to SOLID design principles","authors":"Elena Chebanyuk, K. Markov","doi":"10.5220/0005830104350441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An approach, verifying class diagram correspondence to SOLID Design Principles, is proposed in this paper. SOLID is an acronym, encapsulating the five class diagram design principles namely: Single Responsibility, Open-Closed, Liskov Substitution, Interface Segregation and Dependency Inversion. To check whether a class diagram meets to SOLID, its analytical representation is analyzed by means of predicate expressions. For every SOLID design principle corresponded predicate expressions are proposed. Analytical representation describes interaction of class diagram constituents, namely classes and interfaces, in set-theory terms. Also criteria for estimation of obtained results are formulated. Example of class diagram verification according to the suggested verification approach is also represented in this paper. The advantages of the proposed verification approach implementing to improve the quality of different software development lifecycle processes are outlined in the conclusions.","PeriodicalId":360028,"journal":{"name":"2016 4th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 4th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0005830104350441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

An approach, verifying class diagram correspondence to SOLID Design Principles, is proposed in this paper. SOLID is an acronym, encapsulating the five class diagram design principles namely: Single Responsibility, Open-Closed, Liskov Substitution, Interface Segregation and Dependency Inversion. To check whether a class diagram meets to SOLID, its analytical representation is analyzed by means of predicate expressions. For every SOLID design principle corresponded predicate expressions are proposed. Analytical representation describes interaction of class diagram constituents, namely classes and interfaces, in set-theory terms. Also criteria for estimation of obtained results are formulated. Example of class diagram verification according to the suggested verification approach is also represented in this paper. The advantages of the proposed verification approach implementing to improve the quality of different software development lifecycle processes are outlined in the conclusions.
一种基于SOLID设计原则的类图验证方法
本文提出了一种验证类图是否符合SOLID设计原则的方法。SOLID是首字母缩略词,封装了五个类图设计原则,即:单一职责、开闭、Liskov替代、接口隔离和依赖倒置。为了检查类图是否符合SOLID,通过谓词表达式分析其分析表示。对于每个SOLID设计原则,都提出了相应的谓词表达式。分析表示用集合论的术语描述类图组成部分(即类和接口)的相互作用。此外,还制定了估计所得结果的准则。文中还给出了根据所建议的验证方法进行类图验证的实例。在结论中概述了所提出的验证方法在提高不同软件开发生命周期过程质量方面的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信