Tight Running Time Lower Bounds for Vertex Deletion Problems

Christian Komusiewicz
{"title":"Tight Running Time Lower Bounds for Vertex Deletion Problems","authors":"Christian Komusiewicz","doi":"10.1145/3186589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For a graph class Π, the Π-Vertex Deletion problem has as input an undirected graph G = (V,E) and an integer k and asks whether there is a set of at most k vertices that can be deleted from G such that the resulting graph is a member of Π. By a classic result of Lewis and Yannakakis [17], Π-Vertex Deletion is NP-hard for all hereditary properties Π. We adapt the original NP-hardness construction to show that under the exponential time hypothesis (ETH), tight complexity results can be obtained. We show that Π-Vertex Deletion does not admit a 2o(n)-time algorithm where n is the number of vertices in G. We also obtain a dichotomy for running time bounds that include the number m of edges in the input graph. On the one hand, if Π contains all edgeless graphs, then there is no 2o(n+m)-time algorithm for Π-Vertex Deletion. On the other hand, if there is a fixed edgeless graph that is not contained in Π and containment in Π can be determined in 2O(n) time or 2o(m) time, then Π-Vertex Deletion can be solved in 2O(√m)+O(n) or 2o(m)+O(n) time, respectively. We also consider restrictions on the domain of the input graph G. For example, we obtain that Π-Vertex Deletion cannot be solved in 2o(√n) time if G is planar and Π is hereditary and contains and excludes infinitely many planar graphs. Finally, we provide similar results for the problem variant where the deleted vertex set has to induce a connected graph.","PeriodicalId":198744,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computation Theory (TOCT)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computation Theory (TOCT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3186589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

For a graph class Π, the Π-Vertex Deletion problem has as input an undirected graph G = (V,E) and an integer k and asks whether there is a set of at most k vertices that can be deleted from G such that the resulting graph is a member of Π. By a classic result of Lewis and Yannakakis [17], Π-Vertex Deletion is NP-hard for all hereditary properties Π. We adapt the original NP-hardness construction to show that under the exponential time hypothesis (ETH), tight complexity results can be obtained. We show that Π-Vertex Deletion does not admit a 2o(n)-time algorithm where n is the number of vertices in G. We also obtain a dichotomy for running time bounds that include the number m of edges in the input graph. On the one hand, if Π contains all edgeless graphs, then there is no 2o(n+m)-time algorithm for Π-Vertex Deletion. On the other hand, if there is a fixed edgeless graph that is not contained in Π and containment in Π can be determined in 2O(n) time or 2o(m) time, then Π-Vertex Deletion can be solved in 2O(√m)+O(n) or 2o(m)+O(n) time, respectively. We also consider restrictions on the domain of the input graph G. For example, we obtain that Π-Vertex Deletion cannot be solved in 2o(√n) time if G is planar and Π is hereditary and contains and excludes infinitely many planar graphs. Finally, we provide similar results for the problem variant where the deleted vertex set has to induce a connected graph.
顶点删除问题的紧运行时间下界
对于一个图类Π, Π-Vertex删除问题有一个无向图G = (V,E)和一个整数k作为输入,并询问是否存在一个最多k个顶点的集合,可以从G中删除,使得结果图是Π的成员。根据Lewis和Yannakakis[17]的经典结果,Π-Vertex对于所有遗传特性来说,缺失都是NP-hard的Π。我们对原来的np -硬度结构进行了调整,证明在指数时间假设(ETH)下,可以得到紧复杂度的结果。我们证明Π-Vertex删除不允许20 (n)时间算法,其中n是g中的顶点数。我们还获得了包含输入图中边数m的运行时间界限的二分类。一方面,如果Π包含所有无边图,则不存在耗时20 (n+m)的Π-Vertex delete算法。另一方面,如果存在一个不包含在Π中的固定无边图,并且在20 (n)或20 (m)时间内可以确定Π中的包含,则Π-Vertex的删除可以分别在20(√m)+O(n)或20 (m)+O(n)时间内解决。我们还考虑了输入图G的域上的限制,例如,我们得到了Π-Vertex不能在20(√n)时间内解决删除,如果G是平面的,Π是遗传的,包含和排除无限多个平面图。最后,对于删除的顶点集必须生成连通图的问题变体,我们提供了类似的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信