Refute: An Alternative to ‘Explain in Plain English’ Questions

Viraj Kumar
{"title":"Refute: An Alternative to ‘Explain in Plain English’ Questions","authors":"Viraj Kumar","doi":"10.1145/3446871.3469791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the owner/author(s). ICER 2021, August 16–19, 2021, Virtual Event, USA © 2021 Copyright held by the owner/author(s). ACM ISBN 978-1-4503-8326-4/21/08. https://doi.org/10.1145/3446871.3469791 analyzing student answers to “Explain in Plain English” (EiPE) [12] (or “Explain in your own words” [5]) questions. In line with Xie et al.’s theory of instruction for introductory programming [13], such questions can be used as summative and formative items [3] to assess code reading skills. However, we highlight four concerns with EiPE questions, and we propose an alternative question type – Refute (Figure 1) – that seeks to address these concerns.","PeriodicalId":309835,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3446871.3469791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the owner/author(s). ICER 2021, August 16–19, 2021, Virtual Event, USA © 2021 Copyright held by the owner/author(s). ACM ISBN 978-1-4503-8326-4/21/08. https://doi.org/10.1145/3446871.3469791 analyzing student answers to “Explain in Plain English” (EiPE) [12] (or “Explain in your own words” [5]) questions. In line with Xie et al.’s theory of instruction for introductory programming [13], such questions can be used as summative and formative items [3] to assess code reading skills. However, we highlight four concerns with EiPE questions, and we propose an alternative question type – Refute (Figure 1) – that seeks to address these concerns.
反驳:“用简单的英语解释”问题的另一种选择
允许制作部分或全部作品的数字或硬拷贝供个人或课堂使用,但不收取任何费用,前提是制作或分发副本不是为了盈利或商业利益,并且副本在第一页上带有本通知和完整的引用。本作品的第三方组件的版权必须得到尊重。对于所有其他用途,请联系所有者/作者。icer2021, 2021年8月16日至19日,虚拟事件,美国©2021版权由所有者/作者持有。Acm isbn 978-1-4503-8326-4/21/08。https://doi.org/10.1145/3446871.3469791分析学生对“用简单英语解释”(EiPE)[12](或“用自己的话解释”[5])问题的回答。根据Xie等人的编程入门教学理论[13],这些问题可以作为总结性和形成性项目[3]来评估代码阅读技能。然而,我们强调了EiPE问题的四个关注点,并提出了另一种问题类型- Refute(图1)-旨在解决这些关注点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信