QoS performance analysis of non-slotted and slotted optical burst switched networks

Yahaya Coulibaly, Muhammad Shafie Abd Latiff, Abubakar Muhammad Umaru, N. M. Garcia
{"title":"QoS performance analysis of non-slotted and slotted optical burst switched networks","authors":"Yahaya Coulibaly, Muhammad Shafie Abd Latiff, Abubakar Muhammad Umaru, N. M. Garcia","doi":"10.1109/MICC.2015.7725425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The need for large-bandwidth networks is in continuous growth. Such demands are attributed to the user desire to have everything on-line. To support needs, all-optical networks, with their large bandwidth lend themselves considerable attention from both industry and academia. As a result, some optical switching paradigms have been proposed such as optical circuit switching, optical packet switching and optical burst switching. Among these paradigms, Optical Burst Switching (OBS) is seen as a viable solution. However, lack of mature optical memory makes burst loss ratio in OBS critical which needs to be solved before OBS can really be used in telecommunication networks. Many solutions have been proposed and evaluated to address this issue. These solutions can be categorised into two categories: architectural solutions and procedural solutions. Architectural solutions deal with the architectural design of OBS and these solutions are further classified into two classes: non-slotted and slotted OBS. Procedural solutions deal with the improvement of the operation of OBS networks in terms of burst assembly, routing, switching, scheduling, signalling, etc. In this paper, we focus on architectural solutions where we investigate QoS performance of non-slotted and slotted OBS in terms of burst loss ratio and throughput. Simulation results show that slotted outperforms non-slotted OBS; the results also demonstrate that higher priority bursts outperforms lower priority ones.","PeriodicalId":225244,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 12th Malaysia International Conference on Communications (MICC)","volume":"143 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 12th Malaysia International Conference on Communications (MICC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MICC.2015.7725425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The need for large-bandwidth networks is in continuous growth. Such demands are attributed to the user desire to have everything on-line. To support needs, all-optical networks, with their large bandwidth lend themselves considerable attention from both industry and academia. As a result, some optical switching paradigms have been proposed such as optical circuit switching, optical packet switching and optical burst switching. Among these paradigms, Optical Burst Switching (OBS) is seen as a viable solution. However, lack of mature optical memory makes burst loss ratio in OBS critical which needs to be solved before OBS can really be used in telecommunication networks. Many solutions have been proposed and evaluated to address this issue. These solutions can be categorised into two categories: architectural solutions and procedural solutions. Architectural solutions deal with the architectural design of OBS and these solutions are further classified into two classes: non-slotted and slotted OBS. Procedural solutions deal with the improvement of the operation of OBS networks in terms of burst assembly, routing, switching, scheduling, signalling, etc. In this paper, we focus on architectural solutions where we investigate QoS performance of non-slotted and slotted OBS in terms of burst loss ratio and throughput. Simulation results show that slotted outperforms non-slotted OBS; the results also demonstrate that higher priority bursts outperforms lower priority ones.
无槽和槽光突发交换网络的QoS性能分析
对大带宽网络的需求在不断增长。这种需求归因于用户希望所有东西都能在线。为了满足需求,全光网络以其大带宽得到了工业界和学术界的广泛关注。因此,人们提出了光电路交换、光分组交换和光突发交换等光交换模式。在这些范例中,光突发交换(OBS)被视为一种可行的解决方案。然而,由于缺乏成熟的光存储器,使得光存储系统中的突发损耗率成为关键问题,在光存储系统真正应用于电信网络之前,需要解决这个问题。为了解决这个问题,已经提出并评估了许多解决方案。这些解决方案可以分为两类:架构解决方案和过程解决方案。体系结构解决方案处理OBS的体系结构设计,这些解决方案进一步分为两类:非槽式OBS和槽式OBS。程序解决方案从突发集合、路由、交换、调度、信令等方面改进OBS网络的运行。在本文中,我们将重点放在架构解决方案上,从突发损失率和吞吐量的角度研究非槽和槽OBS的QoS性能。仿真结果表明,开槽OBS优于非开槽OBS;结果还表明,高优先级的爆发优于低优先级的爆发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信