{"title":"After the Original: Hollar and Leonardo’s Salvator","authors":"Margaret Dalivalle, M. Kemp, R. B. Simon","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198813835.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 12 reviews the Bohemian artist Wencelaus Hollar’s 1650 etching of Leonardo’s Salvator Mundi, which, he stated, was made from the original painting. Can we identify Hollar’s model, and on what basis did he attribute it to Leonardo? From a comparison with the closest extant compositions—the Cook, Naples, and Ganay paintings—the chapter examines the consonances and dissonances between the respective paintings and the etching. Since the Ganay painting has been championed (without acceptance) as Leonardo’s original, a history of the scholarly appraisal of this painting, together with some clarifications of its pre-twentieth-century provenance, is presented here. Hollar’s etching is dated 1650, but the location of execution is not given. Can we pinpoint the location in 1650 of any of the prime contenders, and if so, can Hollar be placed in proximity? The chapter proposes that Hollar, perhaps acting for the agent of Cardinal Mazarin, copied Leonardo’s Salvator Mundi at the Commonwealth Sale in 1650.","PeriodicalId":347013,"journal":{"name":"Leonardo's Salvator Mundi and the Collecting of Leonardo in the Stuart Courts","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leonardo's Salvator Mundi and the Collecting of Leonardo in the Stuart Courts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198813835.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Chapter 12 reviews the Bohemian artist Wencelaus Hollar’s 1650 etching of Leonardo’s Salvator Mundi, which, he stated, was made from the original painting. Can we identify Hollar’s model, and on what basis did he attribute it to Leonardo? From a comparison with the closest extant compositions—the Cook, Naples, and Ganay paintings—the chapter examines the consonances and dissonances between the respective paintings and the etching. Since the Ganay painting has been championed (without acceptance) as Leonardo’s original, a history of the scholarly appraisal of this painting, together with some clarifications of its pre-twentieth-century provenance, is presented here. Hollar’s etching is dated 1650, but the location of execution is not given. Can we pinpoint the location in 1650 of any of the prime contenders, and if so, can Hollar be placed in proximity? The chapter proposes that Hollar, perhaps acting for the agent of Cardinal Mazarin, copied Leonardo’s Salvator Mundi at the Commonwealth Sale in 1650.