Source-based software risk assessment

A. Deursen, T. Kuipers
{"title":"Source-based software risk assessment","authors":"A. Deursen, T. Kuipers","doi":"10.1109/ICSM.2003.1235448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper reports on a method for software risk assessments that take into account \"primary facts\" and \"secondary facts\". Primary facts are those obtained through automatically analyzing the source code of a system, and secondary facts are those facts obtained from people working with or on the system, and available documentation. We describe how both types of facts are retrieved, and how we are bridging the interpretation gap from the raw facts (either primary or secondary) to a concise risk assessment, which includes recommendations to minimize the risk. This method has been developed while performing numerous risk assessments, and is continuously being fine-tuned.","PeriodicalId":141256,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2003. ICSM 2003. Proceedings.","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"70","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2003. ICSM 2003. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2003.1235448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 70

Abstract

The paper reports on a method for software risk assessments that take into account "primary facts" and "secondary facts". Primary facts are those obtained through automatically analyzing the source code of a system, and secondary facts are those facts obtained from people working with or on the system, and available documentation. We describe how both types of facts are retrieved, and how we are bridging the interpretation gap from the raw facts (either primary or secondary) to a concise risk assessment, which includes recommendations to minimize the risk. This method has been developed while performing numerous risk assessments, and is continuously being fine-tuned.
基于源代码的软件风险评估
本文报告了一种考虑“主要事实”和“次要事实”的软件风险评估方法。主要事实是那些通过自动分析系统源代码获得的事实,次要事实是那些从与系统一起工作的人以及可用的文档中获得的事实。我们描述了这两种类型的事实是如何被检索的,以及我们如何从原始事实(无论是主要的还是次要的)到简明的风险评估之间的解释差距,其中包括最小化风险的建议。这种方法是在执行大量风险评估的同时开发出来的,并且正在不断地进行微调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信