Are CISQ Reliability Measures Practical? A Research Perspective

Johannes Bräuer, Reinhold Plösch, Manuel Windhager
{"title":"Are CISQ Reliability Measures Practical? A Research Perspective","authors":"Johannes Bräuer, Reinhold Plösch, Manuel Windhager","doi":"10.1109/ICSTW.2017.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Object Management Group (OMG), which is driven by industry, proposes an operational standard for measuring reliability by providing specifications for 29 reliability measures. The goal of this article is to systematically assess whether (1) the provided measurement specifications are suitable to be implemented in a static testing tool used in practice and (2) the measures are suitable for capturing reliability issues in software. Therefore, we implemented the CISQ measures (CISQ is the consortium responsible for driving the quality related topics of the OMG) for Java in our quality measurement tool after defining assumptions resulting from the language independent and at some point imprecise specifications. In format of a case study, the CISQ-based measurement tool has then been applied on several versions of the open source project HSQLDB. The results show that CISQ measures properties that are vital for fulfilling reliability requirements. In the course of the case study, the engineers of HSQLDB fixed a number of issues identified by our tooling as they were considered to be critical. While a number of rule violations are considered to be still problematic, they could not be fixed since the engineers did not have the code ownership. In these cases, they proposed improvement suggestions to the responsible teams.","PeriodicalId":312017,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTW.2017.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Object Management Group (OMG), which is driven by industry, proposes an operational standard for measuring reliability by providing specifications for 29 reliability measures. The goal of this article is to systematically assess whether (1) the provided measurement specifications are suitable to be implemented in a static testing tool used in practice and (2) the measures are suitable for capturing reliability issues in software. Therefore, we implemented the CISQ measures (CISQ is the consortium responsible for driving the quality related topics of the OMG) for Java in our quality measurement tool after defining assumptions resulting from the language independent and at some point imprecise specifications. In format of a case study, the CISQ-based measurement tool has then been applied on several versions of the open source project HSQLDB. The results show that CISQ measures properties that are vital for fulfilling reliability requirements. In the course of the case study, the engineers of HSQLDB fixed a number of issues identified by our tooling as they were considered to be critical. While a number of rule violations are considered to be still problematic, they could not be fixed since the engineers did not have the code ownership. In these cases, they proposed improvement suggestions to the responsible teams.
CISQ可靠性措施实用吗?研究视角
由工业界推动的对象管理组织(OMG)通过提供29种可靠性度量的规范,提出了测量可靠性的操作标准。本文的目标是系统地评估(1)提供的度量规范是否适合在实践中使用的静态测试工具中实现,以及(2)度量是否适合捕获软件中的可靠性问题。因此,在定义了由独立于语言和在某种程度上不精确的规范所产生的假设之后,我们在我们的质量度量工具中为Java实现了CISQ度量(CISQ是负责推动OMG的质量相关主题的联盟)。以案例研究的形式,基于cisq的度量工具随后被应用于开放源码项目HSQLDB的几个版本。结果表明,CISQ测量的特性对满足可靠性要求至关重要。在案例研究的过程中,HSQLDB的工程师修复了许多由我们的工具确定的问题,因为它们被认为是关键的。尽管许多违反规则的情况仍被认为是有问题的,但由于工程师没有代码所有权,这些问题无法修复。在这些情况下,他们向负责的团队提出改进建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书