National and Foreign Experience in Implementing Tax Amnesty: Comparative Legal Aspect

K. Tokareva
{"title":"National and Foreign Experience in Implementing Tax Amnesty: Comparative Legal Aspect","authors":"K. Tokareva","doi":"10.37772/2518-1718-2022-4(40)-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem setting. The article examines the legal regulation of such an institution as tax amnesty in different countries of the world. It is emphasized that in each country the introduction of such an institution has its own peculiarities of consolidation and implementation. At the same time, such peculiarities are due to various factors, for example, such as: the territorial and budgetary structure of the State, the model of the tax system, the model of relations between authorized and obligated participants of tax relations, etc. Analysis of recent researches and publications. Tax amnesty, the prospects for its implementation, and the experience of foreign countries have been the subject of research by such scholars as I. Bezzub, A. Glazova, O. Dmytryk, O. Makukh, I. Prykhodko, O. Slizko etc. The target of the research is to make a comparative legal analysis of the implementation of tax amnesty in the Ukraine and abroad. Article’s main body. Based on the analysis of the legal mechanisms of tax amnesty in such countries as Turkey, Germany, Luxembourg, and Italy, the author emphasizes that such positive experience is of great importance for Ukraine. Such an approach is due to the fact that almost all of the countries in question are already current EU members or are seeking to join the Union. It is emphasized that their legislative acts are aimed at economically beneficial and adequate cooperation between the state and the taxpayer. The tendency to consolidate the institution under study at the State level is a confident step towards de-shadowing of the economy, both for small and large businesses. Conclusions and prospects for the development. The article also examines some peculiarities of tax amnesty regulation in Ukraine. In particular, the author refers to such a type of tax amnesty as a one-time (special) voluntary declaration of assets of individuals. It is emphasized that this declaration is characterized by the presence of its own legal mechanism. At the same time, such a mechanism is not identical to the mechanisms of tax amnesty in foreign countries. It is emphasized that the national tax legislation of Ukraine for the first time introduced a mechanism of alternative rates of fee for a one-time (special) voluntary declaration of assets of individuals. It should be noted that such an alternative is inextricably linked to the installment procedure, which differs significantly from the traditional mechanism of taxpayers’ tax debt installment.","PeriodicalId":133481,"journal":{"name":"Law and innovations","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2022-4(40)-15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem setting. The article examines the legal regulation of such an institution as tax amnesty in different countries of the world. It is emphasized that in each country the introduction of such an institution has its own peculiarities of consolidation and implementation. At the same time, such peculiarities are due to various factors, for example, such as: the territorial and budgetary structure of the State, the model of the tax system, the model of relations between authorized and obligated participants of tax relations, etc. Analysis of recent researches and publications. Tax amnesty, the prospects for its implementation, and the experience of foreign countries have been the subject of research by such scholars as I. Bezzub, A. Glazova, O. Dmytryk, O. Makukh, I. Prykhodko, O. Slizko etc. The target of the research is to make a comparative legal analysis of the implementation of tax amnesty in the Ukraine and abroad. Article’s main body. Based on the analysis of the legal mechanisms of tax amnesty in such countries as Turkey, Germany, Luxembourg, and Italy, the author emphasizes that such positive experience is of great importance for Ukraine. Such an approach is due to the fact that almost all of the countries in question are already current EU members or are seeking to join the Union. It is emphasized that their legislative acts are aimed at economically beneficial and adequate cooperation between the state and the taxpayer. The tendency to consolidate the institution under study at the State level is a confident step towards de-shadowing of the economy, both for small and large businesses. Conclusions and prospects for the development. The article also examines some peculiarities of tax amnesty regulation in Ukraine. In particular, the author refers to such a type of tax amnesty as a one-time (special) voluntary declaration of assets of individuals. It is emphasized that this declaration is characterized by the presence of its own legal mechanism. At the same time, such a mechanism is not identical to the mechanisms of tax amnesty in foreign countries. It is emphasized that the national tax legislation of Ukraine for the first time introduced a mechanism of alternative rates of fee for a one-time (special) voluntary declaration of assets of individuals. It should be noted that such an alternative is inextricably linked to the installment procedure, which differs significantly from the traditional mechanism of taxpayers’ tax debt installment.
中外实施税收特赦的经验:比较法学视角
问题设置。本文考察了世界各国对税收赦免制度的法律规制。它强调指出,在每一个国家,建立这样一个机构都有其巩固和执行的特点。与此同时,这些特点是由各种因素造成的,例如:国家的领土和预算结构、税收制度的模式、税收关系的授权和义务参与者之间的关系模式等。分析最近的研究和出版物。税收大赦、其实施的前景以及国外的经验一直是I. Bezzub、A. Glazova、O. Dmytryk、O. Makukh、I. Prykhodko、O. Slizko等学者研究的主题。研究的目的是对乌克兰和国外实施税收特赦的情况进行比较法律分析。文章的主体。笔者通过对土耳其、德国、卢森堡、意大利等国税收特赦法律机制的分析,强调这些积极经验对乌克兰具有重要的借鉴意义。之所以采取这种做法,是因为几乎所有相关国家都已经是欧盟成员国,或者正在寻求加入欧盟。强调他们的立法行为旨在经济利益和国家与纳税人之间的充分合作。在国家一级巩固所研究的机构的趋势,是为小型和大型企业消除经济阴影的自信步骤。结论及发展展望。文章还考察了乌克兰税收特赦法规的一些特点。作者特别指出,这种税收赦免是指个人一次性(特别)自愿申报资产。有人强调,这一宣言的特点是有其自己的法律机制。同时,这种机制与国外的税收特赦机制也不完全相同。值得强调的是,乌克兰的国家税收立法首次对个人一次性(特别)自愿申报资产实行替代性费率机制。需要指出的是,这种替代方式与分期付款程序有着千丝万缕的联系,与传统的纳税人纳税债务分期付款机制有很大的不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信