To study functional outcome of single level discectomy by fenestration method in lumber disc prolapse- A prospective study

Sachin Pachori, Saksham Sharma, Jiya Lal Bairwa, Harishankar Meena, Mahendra Singh Tak
{"title":"To study functional outcome of single level discectomy by fenestration method in lumber disc prolapse- A prospective study","authors":"Sachin Pachori, Saksham Sharma, Jiya Lal Bairwa, Harishankar Meena, Mahendra Singh Tak","doi":"10.18231/j.ijor.2023.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Low backache pain affects every population and is one of the most common clinical symptoms encountered in medical practice. Approximately 70 - 80% of people have experienced low back pain at some point of time in life. The annual prevalence of low back pain ranges from 15-45%. The major cause of low back pain leading to severe morbidity throughout the world that affects mainly the young working-class population is lumbar disc prolapsed. Various retrospective and some prospective reviews of fenestration disc surgeries orthopaedicvary greatly, with good results ranging from 46-97% and a reoperation rate of 09%. The present study was conducted to evaluate the results of single-level discectomy by fenestration method in Lumbar disc prolapse. Total thirty cases of lumber disc prolapsed treated with fenestration and discectomy satisfying inclusion and exclusion criteria treated in the Facility based tertiary care centre department of Orthopedics of Dr. S. N. Medical College and associated group of hospital, Jodhpur were studied.In our study,Out of 30 patients majority of 25 (83.3%) patients showed good outcomes, followed by 04 (13.33%) patients had fair outcomes, and 01(3.33%) patient had poor outcomes. Total complications are 4 (13.33%), and the most common complication is superficial wound infection 2 (6.67%). By considering all aspects, fenestration, and discectomy is a better technique with the advantage of less tissue injury, good spinal function, smooth patient recovery, improved working status with early rehabilitation and maintained clinical efficacy","PeriodicalId":274774,"journal":{"name":"IP International Journal of Orthopaedic Rheumatology","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IP International Journal of Orthopaedic Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijor.2023.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Low backache pain affects every population and is one of the most common clinical symptoms encountered in medical practice. Approximately 70 - 80% of people have experienced low back pain at some point of time in life. The annual prevalence of low back pain ranges from 15-45%. The major cause of low back pain leading to severe morbidity throughout the world that affects mainly the young working-class population is lumbar disc prolapsed. Various retrospective and some prospective reviews of fenestration disc surgeries orthopaedicvary greatly, with good results ranging from 46-97% and a reoperation rate of 09%. The present study was conducted to evaluate the results of single-level discectomy by fenestration method in Lumbar disc prolapse. Total thirty cases of lumber disc prolapsed treated with fenestration and discectomy satisfying inclusion and exclusion criteria treated in the Facility based tertiary care centre department of Orthopedics of Dr. S. N. Medical College and associated group of hospital, Jodhpur were studied.In our study,Out of 30 patients majority of 25 (83.3%) patients showed good outcomes, followed by 04 (13.33%) patients had fair outcomes, and 01(3.33%) patient had poor outcomes. Total complications are 4 (13.33%), and the most common complication is superficial wound infection 2 (6.67%). By considering all aspects, fenestration, and discectomy is a better technique with the advantage of less tissue injury, good spinal function, smooth patient recovery, improved working status with early rehabilitation and maintained clinical efficacy
探讨开窗法单节段椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的功能结局——一项前瞻性研究
腰痛影响每个人群,是医疗实践中最常见的临床症状之一。大约70 - 80%的人在一生中的某个时候都经历过腰痛。每年腰痛的患病率在15-45%之间。腰椎间盘突出是导致腰痛严重发病率的主要原因,在世界范围内主要影响年轻的工人阶级人群。各种回顾性和前瞻性文献对骨科开窗椎间盘手术的评价差异很大,良好的结果在46-97%之间,再手术率为09%。本研究旨在评价开窗法单节段腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的效果。本文研究了在焦特布尔s.n.博士医学院骨科三级护理中心及附属医院接受开窗和椎间盘切除术治疗的30例符合纳入和排除标准的腰椎间盘脱垂患者。在我们的研究中,30例患者中,25例(83.3%)患者预后良好,其次是04例(13.33%)患者预后一般,01例(3.33%)患者预后较差。并发症共4例(13.33%),最常见的并发症为创面浅表感染2例(6.67%)。综合各方面考虑,开窗椎间盘切除术是一种较好的技术,具有组织损伤少、脊柱功能好、患者恢复顺利、早期康复改善工作状态、保持临床疗效等优点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信