Who Should Review this Pull-Request: Reviewer Recommendation to Expedite Crowd Collaboration

Yue Yu, Huaimin Wang, Gang Yin, C. Ling
{"title":"Who Should Review this Pull-Request: Reviewer Recommendation to Expedite Crowd Collaboration","authors":"Yue Yu, Huaimin Wang, Gang Yin, C. Ling","doi":"10.1109/APSEC.2014.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Github facilitates the pull-request mechanism as an outstanding social coding paradigm by integrating with social media. The review process of pull-requests is a typical crowd sourcing job which needs to solicit opinions of the community. Recommending appropriate reviewers can reduce the time between the submission of a pull-request and the actual review of it. In this paper, we firstly extend the traditional Machine Learning (ML) based approach of bug triaging to reviewer recommendation. Furthermore, we analyze social relations between contributors and reviewers, and propose a novel approach to recommend highly relevant reviewers by mining comment networks (CN) of given projects. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of these two approaches with quantitative evaluations. The results show that CN-based approach achieves a significant improvement over the ML-based approach, and on average it reaches a precision of 78% and 67% for top-1 and top-2 recommendation respectively, and a recall of 77% for top-10 recommendation.","PeriodicalId":380881,"journal":{"name":"2014 21st Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"56","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 21st Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2014.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

Abstract

Github facilitates the pull-request mechanism as an outstanding social coding paradigm by integrating with social media. The review process of pull-requests is a typical crowd sourcing job which needs to solicit opinions of the community. Recommending appropriate reviewers can reduce the time between the submission of a pull-request and the actual review of it. In this paper, we firstly extend the traditional Machine Learning (ML) based approach of bug triaging to reviewer recommendation. Furthermore, we analyze social relations between contributors and reviewers, and propose a novel approach to recommend highly relevant reviewers by mining comment networks (CN) of given projects. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of these two approaches with quantitative evaluations. The results show that CN-based approach achieves a significant improvement over the ML-based approach, and on average it reaches a precision of 78% and 67% for top-1 and top-2 recommendation respectively, and a recall of 77% for top-10 recommendation.
谁应该审查这个拉取请求:审稿人的建议,以加快群体协作
Github通过与社交媒体集成,促进了pull-request机制作为一个杰出的社交编码范例。拉取请求的审核过程是一个典型的众包工作,需要征求社区的意见。推荐适当的审阅者可以减少提交拉取请求和实际审阅请求之间的时间。在本文中,我们首先将传统的基于机器学习(ML)的错误分类方法扩展到审稿人推荐。此外,我们分析了投稿人和审稿人之间的社会关系,并提出了一种通过挖掘给定项目的评论网络(CN)来推荐高相关性审稿人的新方法。最后,我们用定量评估来证明这两种方法的有效性。结果表明,基于神经网络的方法比基于机器学习的方法取得了显著的进步,平均而言,对top-1和top-2推荐的准确率分别达到了78%和67%,对top-10推荐的召回率达到了77%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信