Transdisciplinary Team Science in Health Research, Where Are We?

Lin Yang, Brittany Shewchuk, Ce Shang, Jung Ae Lee, Sarah Gehlert
{"title":"Transdisciplinary Team Science in Health Research, Where Are We?","authors":"Lin Yang, Brittany Shewchuk, Ce Shang, Jung Ae Lee, Sarah Gehlert","doi":"10.3233/jid-220011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern medicine and healthcare systems focus on diagnosing, treating, and monitoring diseases in clinical practice. However, contemporary disease burden is driven by chronic diseases, whose determinants occur across multiple levels of influence, from genetics to changes in the natural, built environments to societal conditions and policies. Conventional discipline-specific approaches are useful for the discovery and accumulation of knowledge on single causes of disease entities. Multidisciplinary collaborations can facilitate the identification of the causes of diseases at multi-level, while interdisciplinary collaboration remains limited to transferring tools from one discipline to another, perhaps creating new disciplines (molecular epidemiology, etc). However, these forms of disciplinary collaboration fall short in capturing the complexity of chronic disease. In addition, these approaches lack sufficient power to generate knowledge that is translatable into implementable solutions, because their failure to provide a holistic view limited their ability to capture the complexity of real-world problems. Transdisciplinary collaborations gained popularity in health research in the 1990 s, when disciplinary researchers began to develop integrated research frameworks that transcended discipline-specific methods. Using cancer research as an example, this position paper describes the nature of different disciplinary collaborations, reviews transdisciplinary research projects funded by the US National Cancer Institute, discusses frameworks to develop shared mental model in teams and the evaluation of transdisciplinary collaborations, highlights the role of team science in successful transdisciplinary health research, and proposed future research to develop science of team science.","PeriodicalId":342559,"journal":{"name":"J. Integr. Des. Process. Sci.","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Integr. Des. Process. Sci.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/jid-220011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modern medicine and healthcare systems focus on diagnosing, treating, and monitoring diseases in clinical practice. However, contemporary disease burden is driven by chronic diseases, whose determinants occur across multiple levels of influence, from genetics to changes in the natural, built environments to societal conditions and policies. Conventional discipline-specific approaches are useful for the discovery and accumulation of knowledge on single causes of disease entities. Multidisciplinary collaborations can facilitate the identification of the causes of diseases at multi-level, while interdisciplinary collaboration remains limited to transferring tools from one discipline to another, perhaps creating new disciplines (molecular epidemiology, etc). However, these forms of disciplinary collaboration fall short in capturing the complexity of chronic disease. In addition, these approaches lack sufficient power to generate knowledge that is translatable into implementable solutions, because their failure to provide a holistic view limited their ability to capture the complexity of real-world problems. Transdisciplinary collaborations gained popularity in health research in the 1990 s, when disciplinary researchers began to develop integrated research frameworks that transcended discipline-specific methods. Using cancer research as an example, this position paper describes the nature of different disciplinary collaborations, reviews transdisciplinary research projects funded by the US National Cancer Institute, discusses frameworks to develop shared mental model in teams and the evaluation of transdisciplinary collaborations, highlights the role of team science in successful transdisciplinary health research, and proposed future research to develop science of team science.
健康研究中的跨学科团队科学,我们在哪里?
现代医学和卫生保健系统侧重于临床实践中的疾病诊断、治疗和监测。然而,当代疾病负担是由慢性病造成的,其决定因素具有多重影响,从遗传学到自然、建筑环境的变化,再到社会条件和政策。传统的特定学科方法对于发现和积累关于疾病实体的单一原因的知识是有用的。多学科合作可以促进在多层次上确定疾病的原因,而跨学科合作仍然局限于将工具从一个学科转移到另一个学科,也许创造新的学科(分子流行病学等)。然而,这些形式的学科合作在把握慢性病的复杂性方面存在不足。此外,这些方法缺乏足够的能力来产生可转化为可实现的解决方案的知识,因为它们无法提供整体视图,限制了它们捕捉现实世界问题复杂性的能力。20世纪90年代,跨学科合作在卫生研究中得到普及,当时学科研究人员开始开发超越学科特定方法的综合研究框架。本文以癌症研究为例,介绍了不同学科合作的性质,回顾了美国国家癌症研究所资助的跨学科研究项目,讨论了开发团队共享心理模型的框架和跨学科合作的评估,强调了团队科学在成功的跨学科健康研究中的作用,并提出了未来发展团队科学的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信