The External Communication Activities, Tools and Structures of the European Commission: Lessons Learned and New Avenues

Sebastian. Kurpas, Christoph O. Meyer, Michael Bruggemann
{"title":"The External Communication Activities, Tools and Structures of the European Commission: Lessons Learned and New Avenues","authors":"Sebastian. Kurpas, Christoph O. Meyer, Michael Bruggemann","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1996546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This report contains the main findings and recommendations of a major study carried out by CEPS on the European Commission’s external communication activities, tools and structures. The objective of the study was to provide analytical insight and research-based recommendations to the Screening Working Group of the European Commission concerned with the institution’s public communications. The overall questions addressed included: \n• What lessons can be drawn from past and current activities on the best cost-benefit ratio of different communication activities and tools for specific objectives/priorities/target groups? \n• How can the allocation of resources devoted to communication within the Commission be improved to make communication more efficient and effective? \n• How can the governance model for communication activities be further improved to make communication more efficient and effective? \n• Can duplication or gaps in the communication activities of the different DGs, including Representations (REPs), be detected, and if so, how can they be addressed? \n• Are there any communication activities that could/should be discontinued on grounds of lacking cost-benefit or changing environment (new technologies, etc.)? \nThe research for this report was carried out in 2007.","PeriodicalId":307125,"journal":{"name":"Institutional & Transition Economics Policy Paper Series","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institutional & Transition Economics Policy Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1996546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This report contains the main findings and recommendations of a major study carried out by CEPS on the European Commission’s external communication activities, tools and structures. The objective of the study was to provide analytical insight and research-based recommendations to the Screening Working Group of the European Commission concerned with the institution’s public communications. The overall questions addressed included: • What lessons can be drawn from past and current activities on the best cost-benefit ratio of different communication activities and tools for specific objectives/priorities/target groups? • How can the allocation of resources devoted to communication within the Commission be improved to make communication more efficient and effective? • How can the governance model for communication activities be further improved to make communication more efficient and effective? • Can duplication or gaps in the communication activities of the different DGs, including Representations (REPs), be detected, and if so, how can they be addressed? • Are there any communication activities that could/should be discontinued on grounds of lacking cost-benefit or changing environment (new technologies, etc.)? The research for this report was carried out in 2007.
欧盟委员会的对外沟通活动、工具和结构:经验教训和新途径
本报告载有CEPS对欧洲委员会对外沟通活动、工具和结构进行的一项重大研究的主要结果和建议。这项研究的目的是向欧洲委员会审查工作组提供有关该机构公共通讯的分析性见解和基于研究的建议。讨论的总体问题包括:•从过去和当前的活动中可以吸取哪些教训,以确定针对特定目标/优先事项/目标群体的不同传播活动和工具的最佳成本效益比?•如何改进委员会内部专门用于传播的资源分配,以提高传播效率和效果?•如何进一步完善传播活动的治理模式,使传播更加高效和有效?•是否可以发现不同dg(包括代表)的沟通活动中的重复或空白,如果可以,如何解决?•是否有任何传播活动可以/应该因缺乏成本效益或环境变化(新技术等)而停止?本报告的研究是在2007年进行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信