School absenteeism among students in Germany, Japan, Sweden, and the United Kingdom:

U. Fredriksson, Maria Rasmusson, Åsa Backlund, J. Isaksson, Susanne Kreitz-Sandberg
{"title":"School absenteeism among students in Germany, Japan, Sweden, and the United Kingdom:","authors":"U. Fredriksson, Maria Rasmusson, Åsa Backlund, J. Isaksson, Susanne Kreitz-Sandberg","doi":"10.7577/njcie.5034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"School absenteeism is a challenge in many countries. Still, there are few comparisons between countries, which is partly due to a lack of shared definitions of concepts. This article makes use of PISA data to compare self-reported student absenteeism in Germany, Japan, Sweden, and the United Kingdom (UK). Three data sets are used, from 2012, 2015, and 2018. The self-reported absenteeism, which is referred to as truancy in the PISA studies, was measured as having skipped a whole school day at least once in the two full weeks before students completed the PISA student questionnaire.\nThe results show great variation between the studied countries, from 24.4% in the UK in 2015 to 1.5% in Japan in 2012. The percentage of students who reported having skipped school is much higher in the UK than in the other three countries. The differences between the countries concerning the percentage of students reporting having been absent from school are significant for all years, except between Sweden and Germany in 2015. Germany and the UK have a similar pattern in development, with the highest percentages in 2015, while Sweden and Japan have small (albeit not significant) increases from 2012 to 2018. The UK is the only country where the changes between 2012 and 2015 as well as between 2015 and 2018 were significant.\nIt is not possible to see any obvious patterns between the countries that might be linked to differences related to their welfare regimes, education systems, or values. To find such patterns, it may be necessary either to include more countries in a study or to conduct more in-depth studies on each country.","PeriodicalId":161134,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.5034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

School absenteeism is a challenge in many countries. Still, there are few comparisons between countries, which is partly due to a lack of shared definitions of concepts. This article makes use of PISA data to compare self-reported student absenteeism in Germany, Japan, Sweden, and the United Kingdom (UK). Three data sets are used, from 2012, 2015, and 2018. The self-reported absenteeism, which is referred to as truancy in the PISA studies, was measured as having skipped a whole school day at least once in the two full weeks before students completed the PISA student questionnaire. The results show great variation between the studied countries, from 24.4% in the UK in 2015 to 1.5% in Japan in 2012. The percentage of students who reported having skipped school is much higher in the UK than in the other three countries. The differences between the countries concerning the percentage of students reporting having been absent from school are significant for all years, except between Sweden and Germany in 2015. Germany and the UK have a similar pattern in development, with the highest percentages in 2015, while Sweden and Japan have small (albeit not significant) increases from 2012 to 2018. The UK is the only country where the changes between 2012 and 2015 as well as between 2015 and 2018 were significant. It is not possible to see any obvious patterns between the countries that might be linked to differences related to their welfare regimes, education systems, or values. To find such patterns, it may be necessary either to include more countries in a study or to conduct more in-depth studies on each country.
德国、日本、瑞典和英国学生的旷课情况:
学校缺勤在许多国家都是一个挑战。然而,国家之间很少有比较,部分原因是缺乏对概念的共同定义。本文利用PISA数据比较了德国、日本、瑞典和英国学生自我报告的缺勤情况。使用了三个数据集,分别来自2012年、2015年和2018年。自我报告的旷课,在PISA研究中被称为逃课,是指学生在完成PISA学生问卷之前的两周内至少有一次翘了一整天的课。结果显示,被研究国家之间的差异很大,从2015年英国的24.4%到2012年日本的1.5%。英国逃学的学生比例比其他三个国家高得多。除了2015年瑞典和德国之间的差异外,各国之间关于报告缺课的学生百分比的差异在所有年份都很显著。德国和英国的发展模式类似,2015年的比例最高,而瑞典和日本从2012年到2018年的增幅很小(尽管不显著)。英国是唯一一个在2012年至2015年以及2015年至2018年期间发生重大变化的国家。在这些国家之间不可能看到任何明显的模式,这些模式可能与他们的福利制度、教育制度或价值观的差异有关。为了找到这种模式,可能有必要在一项研究中包括更多的国家,或者对每个国家进行更深入的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信