From Well to Field: Reservoir Rock Porosity Prediction from Advanced Mud Gas Data Using Machine Learning Methodology

F. Anifowose, M. Mezghani, Saleh Badawood, Javed Ismail
{"title":"From Well to Field: Reservoir Rock Porosity Prediction from Advanced Mud Gas Data Using Machine Learning Methodology","authors":"F. Anifowose, M. Mezghani, Saleh Badawood, Javed Ismail","doi":"10.2118/213339-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The utility of advanced mud gas (AMG) data has been limited to fluid typing and petrophysical correlations. There is the need to extend the utility to real-time reservoir characterization prior to wireline logging and geological core description. Our first attempt to predict reservoir rock porosity within a well yielded good result. This study improves on the previous effort by utilizing big data obtained from combining various wells in the study area.\n We used machine learning (ML) methodology in the absence of established physical relationship between AMG data, comprising light and heavy flare gas components, and reservoir rock porosity. More than 20,000 data points collected from representative wells were used to prove the concept of predicting the porosity in an interval or section of any well within the study area. Optimized models of artificial neural network (ANN), decision trees (DT) and random forest (RF) were applied to the combined dataset. The combined dataset was randomly split into training and validation subsets in 70:30 ratio. The 30% validation subset simulates a missing well interval or section.\n Comparing the results of the ANN, DT, and RF models using statistical model performance evaluation metrics, the RF model outperformed the others. The RF model gave a training and validation correlation coefficient (R-Squared) values of 0.94 and 0.83 respectively compared to 0.36 and 0.35 for the ANN and 0.84 and 0.73 for the DT models respectively. However, the p-value and mean errors show that the models are statistically acceptable. Having showed in a previous research that a multivariate linear regression model could not handle the complexity in the relationship between porosity and the flare gas components, these results have further confirmed the robustness of nonlinear solutions based on the ML methodology. We conclude that the ML approach to predicting reservoir rock porosity from advanced mud gas data is feasible and better results are achievable with more research.\n This study has confirmed the feasibility of predicting porosity based on a dataset of combined wells and the huge benefit in extending the utility of AMG data beyond the traditional workflows. This approach is capable of complementing existing reservoir characterization processes in assessing reservoir quality at the early stage of exploration. Future work will investigate the impact of integrating the AMG with surface drilling parameters to possibly increase the prediction accuracy.","PeriodicalId":396949,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Sun, February 19, 2023","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Sun, February 19, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/213339-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The utility of advanced mud gas (AMG) data has been limited to fluid typing and petrophysical correlations. There is the need to extend the utility to real-time reservoir characterization prior to wireline logging and geological core description. Our first attempt to predict reservoir rock porosity within a well yielded good result. This study improves on the previous effort by utilizing big data obtained from combining various wells in the study area. We used machine learning (ML) methodology in the absence of established physical relationship between AMG data, comprising light and heavy flare gas components, and reservoir rock porosity. More than 20,000 data points collected from representative wells were used to prove the concept of predicting the porosity in an interval or section of any well within the study area. Optimized models of artificial neural network (ANN), decision trees (DT) and random forest (RF) were applied to the combined dataset. The combined dataset was randomly split into training and validation subsets in 70:30 ratio. The 30% validation subset simulates a missing well interval or section. Comparing the results of the ANN, DT, and RF models using statistical model performance evaluation metrics, the RF model outperformed the others. The RF model gave a training and validation correlation coefficient (R-Squared) values of 0.94 and 0.83 respectively compared to 0.36 and 0.35 for the ANN and 0.84 and 0.73 for the DT models respectively. However, the p-value and mean errors show that the models are statistically acceptable. Having showed in a previous research that a multivariate linear regression model could not handle the complexity in the relationship between porosity and the flare gas components, these results have further confirmed the robustness of nonlinear solutions based on the ML methodology. We conclude that the ML approach to predicting reservoir rock porosity from advanced mud gas data is feasible and better results are achievable with more research. This study has confirmed the feasibility of predicting porosity based on a dataset of combined wells and the huge benefit in extending the utility of AMG data beyond the traditional workflows. This approach is capable of complementing existing reservoir characterization processes in assessing reservoir quality at the early stage of exploration. Future work will investigate the impact of integrating the AMG with surface drilling parameters to possibly increase the prediction accuracy.
从井到油田:利用机器学习方法从先进的泥浆气数据预测储层岩石孔隙度
先进的泥浆气(AMG)数据的应用仅限于流体类型和岩石物理相关性。在电缆测井和地质岩心描述之前,有必要将该工具扩展到实时储层特征。我们首次尝试在一口井内预测储层岩石孔隙度,结果很好。本研究利用了研究区域内多口井的大数据,对之前的工作进行了改进。在AMG数据(包括轻质和重质火炬气成分)与储层岩石孔隙度之间缺乏确定的物理关系的情况下,我们使用了机器学习(ML)方法。从代表性井中收集的2万多个数据点被用来证明预测研究区域内任何井的一段或一段孔隙度的概念。将人工神经网络(ANN)、决策树(DT)和随机森林(RF)的优化模型应用于组合数据集。合并后的数据集按70:30的比例随机分为训练子集和验证子集。30%的验证子集模拟缺失的井段或井段。使用统计模型性能评估指标比较ANN、DT和RF模型的结果,RF模型优于其他模型。RF模型的训练和验证相关系数(R-Squared)分别为0.94和0.83,而ANN模型的相关系数为0.36和0.35,DT模型的相关系数为0.84和0.73。然而,p值和平均误差表明模型在统计上是可接受的。在之前的研究中,多元线性回归模型无法处理孔隙度与火炬气组分之间关系的复杂性,这些结果进一步证实了基于ML方法的非线性解的鲁棒性。本文认为,利用深度泥浆气数据进行储层孔隙度预测的ML方法是可行的,并且随着研究的深入,可以获得更好的结果。该研究证实了基于联合井数据集预测孔隙度的可行性,以及将AMG数据扩展到传统工作流程之外的巨大优势。这种方法能够补充现有的储层描述过程,在勘探早期评估储层质量。未来的工作将研究将AMG与地面钻井参数相结合的影响,以可能提高预测精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书