Managing usability defects from identification to closure

Paul-Brian McInerney, C. Pantel, K. Melder
{"title":"Managing usability defects from identification to closure","authors":"Paul-Brian McInerney, C. Pantel, K. Melder","doi":"10.1145/634067.634351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Usability engineering programs generate volumes of raw data that are analyzed and synthesized into findings. While quantitative results such as task completion time and satisfaction ratings are straightforward to analyze and report, qualitative findings are less so. Qualitative findings encompass defects or flaws introduced at various stages of development, user suggestions for improving an acceptable design, and more diffuse usability concerns that need further investigation.It is not sufficient for usability engineers to simply identify usability defects. These defects must be communicated, tracked, resolved, and reported on. The effectiveness of a usability engineering process can be measured by its success rate in causing legitimate usability issues to be successfully resolved. This workshop will seek to identify best practices for managing usability defects from the time they are identified to the time they are closed.","PeriodicalId":351792,"journal":{"name":"CHI '01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"09 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHI '01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/634067.634351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Usability engineering programs generate volumes of raw data that are analyzed and synthesized into findings. While quantitative results such as task completion time and satisfaction ratings are straightforward to analyze and report, qualitative findings are less so. Qualitative findings encompass defects or flaws introduced at various stages of development, user suggestions for improving an acceptable design, and more diffuse usability concerns that need further investigation.It is not sufficient for usability engineers to simply identify usability defects. These defects must be communicated, tracked, resolved, and reported on. The effectiveness of a usability engineering process can be measured by its success rate in causing legitimate usability issues to be successfully resolved. This workshop will seek to identify best practices for managing usability defects from the time they are identified to the time they are closed.
管理从识别到关闭的可用性缺陷
可用性工程程序生成大量的原始数据,这些数据被分析并合成为研究结果。虽然诸如任务完成时间和满意度评级之类的定量结果可以直接分析和报告,但定性结果则不那么容易。定性的发现包括在开发的不同阶段引入的缺陷或缺陷,改进可接受设计的用户建议,以及需要进一步调查的更广泛的可用性问题。对于可用性工程师来说,仅仅识别可用性缺陷是不够的。必须对这些缺陷进行沟通、跟踪、解决和报告。可用性工程过程的有效性可以通过成功解决合理可用性问题的成功率来衡量。这个研讨会将寻求确定管理可用性缺陷的最佳实践,从它们被确定到它们被关闭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信