Voltage unbalance compensation with smart three-phase loads

P. Douglass, I. Trintis, S. Munk‐Nielsen
{"title":"Voltage unbalance compensation with smart three-phase loads","authors":"P. Douglass, I. Trintis, S. Munk‐Nielsen","doi":"10.1109/PSCC.2016.7540918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes the design, proof-of-concept simulations and laboratory test of an algorithm for controlling active front-end rectifiers to reduce voltage unbalance. Using inputs of RMS voltage, the rectifier controller allocates load unevenly on its 3 phases to compensate for voltage unbalance originating in the power supply network. Two variants of the algorithm are tested: first, using phase-neutral (P-N) voltage as input, second, using phase-phase (P-P) voltage. The control algorithm is described, and evaluated in simulations and laboratory tests. Two metrics for quantifying voltage unbalance are evaluated: one metric based on the maximum deviation of RMS P-N voltage from the average voltage and one metric based on negative sequence voltage. The tests show that controlling P-N voltage can in most cases eliminate the deviations of P-N voltage from the average voltage, but it does not reduce the negative sequence voltage. The controller that uses the P-P voltage as input eliminates the negative sequence voltage, and reduces P-N voltage deviations from the average to approximately half of their initial value. Current unbalance is reduced when the voltage unbalance is caused by asymmetrical loads, but it is increased in a scenario with unbalanced voltage sources. These results suggest that the optimal algorithm to reduce system unbalance depends on which system parameter is most important: RMS P-N voltage unbalance, negative sequence voltage, or current unbalance.","PeriodicalId":265395,"journal":{"name":"2016 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PSCC.2016.7540918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

This paper describes the design, proof-of-concept simulations and laboratory test of an algorithm for controlling active front-end rectifiers to reduce voltage unbalance. Using inputs of RMS voltage, the rectifier controller allocates load unevenly on its 3 phases to compensate for voltage unbalance originating in the power supply network. Two variants of the algorithm are tested: first, using phase-neutral (P-N) voltage as input, second, using phase-phase (P-P) voltage. The control algorithm is described, and evaluated in simulations and laboratory tests. Two metrics for quantifying voltage unbalance are evaluated: one metric based on the maximum deviation of RMS P-N voltage from the average voltage and one metric based on negative sequence voltage. The tests show that controlling P-N voltage can in most cases eliminate the deviations of P-N voltage from the average voltage, but it does not reduce the negative sequence voltage. The controller that uses the P-P voltage as input eliminates the negative sequence voltage, and reduces P-N voltage deviations from the average to approximately half of their initial value. Current unbalance is reduced when the voltage unbalance is caused by asymmetrical loads, but it is increased in a scenario with unbalanced voltage sources. These results suggest that the optimal algorithm to reduce system unbalance depends on which system parameter is most important: RMS P-N voltage unbalance, negative sequence voltage, or current unbalance.
智能三相负载电压不平衡补偿
本文描述了一种控制有源前端整流器以降低电压不平衡的算法的设计、概念验证仿真和实验室测试。整流器控制器利用有效值电压输入,在其三相上不均匀地分配负载,以补偿供电网络中产生的电压不平衡。测试了两种算法的变体:第一种是使用相中性(P-N)电压作为输入,第二种是使用相相(P-P)电压。描述了控制算法,并在仿真和实验室测试中进行了评估。评估了两种量化电压不平衡的指标:一种是基于RMS P-N电压与平均电压的最大偏差的指标,另一种是基于负序电压的指标。试验结果表明,控制P-N电压在大多数情况下可以消除P-N电压与平均电压的偏差,但不能降低负序电压。使用P-P电压作为输入的控制器消除了负序电压,并将P-N电压与平均值的偏差减少到其初始值的大约一半。当电压不平衡由不对称负载引起时,电流不平衡减少,但在电压源不平衡的情况下,电流不平衡增加。这些结果表明,减少系统不平衡的最佳算法取决于哪个系统参数最重要:RMS P-N电压不平衡、负序电压不平衡或电流不平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信