Analysis of the Effect of Emotion Elicitation on the Cardiovascular System

E. M. Polo, Maximiliano Mollura, M. Zanet, Marta Lenatti, A. Paglialonga, Riccardo Barbieri
{"title":"Analysis of the Effect of Emotion Elicitation on the Cardiovascular System","authors":"E. M. Polo, Maximiliano Mollura, M. Zanet, Marta Lenatti, A. Paglialonga, Riccardo Barbieri","doi":"10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emotions play an important role in our everyday life, influencing our decision-making process, and also affecting our physiology. Several studies in literature have proposed successful classification models for emotion recognition combining multimodal physiological measures without dwelling on the physiological significance of the measures. Our study aims at finding cardiovascular indices related to the autonomic nervous system that can explain how autonomic control of the heart responds with respect to specific emotions: happiness, fear, relaxation and boredom. Pulse arrival time and pulse pressure measurements have been shown to be significantly separating the 4 emotions, especially along the arousal dimension as expected from previous findings. Importantly, these blood pressure related indices also yielded relevant insights into characterizing the valence dimension when looking at high and low arousal subsets. In addition, these measures were found to be correlated with classical autonomic indices and explanatory in the cardiovascular and autonomic changes elicited by different emotions. Autonomic indices were then used to train a basic support vector machine model obtaining four-class test accuracy in discriminating happiness, relaxation, boredom and fear equal to 44%, 67%, 55%, 44% respectively.","PeriodicalId":126746,"journal":{"name":"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emotions play an important role in our everyday life, influencing our decision-making process, and also affecting our physiology. Several studies in literature have proposed successful classification models for emotion recognition combining multimodal physiological measures without dwelling on the physiological significance of the measures. Our study aims at finding cardiovascular indices related to the autonomic nervous system that can explain how autonomic control of the heart responds with respect to specific emotions: happiness, fear, relaxation and boredom. Pulse arrival time and pulse pressure measurements have been shown to be significantly separating the 4 emotions, especially along the arousal dimension as expected from previous findings. Importantly, these blood pressure related indices also yielded relevant insights into characterizing the valence dimension when looking at high and low arousal subsets. In addition, these measures were found to be correlated with classical autonomic indices and explanatory in the cardiovascular and autonomic changes elicited by different emotions. Autonomic indices were then used to train a basic support vector machine model obtaining four-class test accuracy in discriminating happiness, relaxation, boredom and fear equal to 44%, 67%, 55%, 44% respectively.
情绪激发对心血管系统的影响分析
情绪在我们的日常生活中扮演着重要的角色,影响着我们的决策过程,也影响着我们的生理。一些文献研究提出了结合多模态生理指标的成功情绪识别分类模型,但没有考虑这些指标的生理意义。我们的研究旨在寻找与自主神经系统相关的心血管指数,这些指数可以解释心脏的自主控制如何对特定情绪做出反应:快乐、恐惧、放松和无聊。脉搏到达时间和脉压测量已经被证明可以显著地区分这四种情绪,尤其是在唤醒维度上,正如之前的研究结果所预期的那样。重要的是,当观察高唤醒和低唤醒子集时,这些与血压相关的指数也为表征价态维度提供了相关的见解。此外,这些测量与经典的自主神经指标相关,并解释了不同情绪引起的心血管和自主神经变化。然后利用自主指数训练基本支持向量机模型,得到快乐、放松、无聊、恐惧的四类测试准确率分别为44%、67%、55%、44%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信