Do we teach regression correctly?

P. Hewson
{"title":"Do we teach regression correctly?","authors":"P. Hewson","doi":"10.52041/srap.16704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many interesting social phenomena are innately multidimensional and require suitable data modelling tools. Regression modelling (which includes log linear modelling for contingency tables as a special case) is often the „go-to'“ tool. However, much of the math theory was developed for designed experiments (where explanatory variables X are orthogonal and fixed). Conversely, societal data is often observational with random non-orthogonal X. The pedagogic route to data modelling usually starts with linear models before the introduction of the generalised linear models that can address contingency tables. Whilst good textbooks do feature caveats, the search for a parsimonious model is often carried out in a manner that may promote unsafe interpretation of observational data. This poster tries to present a case for a reform in the teaching of regression for observational data.","PeriodicalId":165958,"journal":{"name":"Promoting Understanding of Statistics about Society IASE Roundtable Conference","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Promoting Understanding of Statistics about Society IASE Roundtable Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52041/srap.16704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many interesting social phenomena are innately multidimensional and require suitable data modelling tools. Regression modelling (which includes log linear modelling for contingency tables as a special case) is often the „go-to'“ tool. However, much of the math theory was developed for designed experiments (where explanatory variables X are orthogonal and fixed). Conversely, societal data is often observational with random non-orthogonal X. The pedagogic route to data modelling usually starts with linear models before the introduction of the generalised linear models that can address contingency tables. Whilst good textbooks do feature caveats, the search for a parsimonious model is often carried out in a manner that may promote unsafe interpretation of observational data. This poster tries to present a case for a reform in the teaching of regression for observational data.
我们教回归正确吗?
许多有趣的社会现象天生就是多维的,需要合适的数据建模工具。回归建模(其中包括作为特例的列联表的对数线性建模)通常是“首选”工具。然而,许多数学理论是为设计实验(解释变量X是正交的和固定的)而发展起来的。相反,社会数据通常是用随机的非正交x来观察的。数据建模的教学路线通常从线性模型开始,然后引入可以处理列联表的广义线性模型。虽然好的教科书确实有一些警告,但寻找一个简约的模型往往是以一种可能促进对观测数据不安全解释的方式进行的。这张海报试图提出一个改革观测数据回归教学的案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信