Identifying Architectural Design Trade-Offs in Service Registry Features

T. Aihkisalo, E. Ovaska
{"title":"Identifying Architectural Design Trade-Offs in Service Registry Features","authors":"T. Aihkisalo, E. Ovaska","doi":"10.1109/SOSE.2017.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Service registry's main responsibility on cloud andweb service platforms among cataloging the services is to manage service capability descriptions and deliver binding instructions of suitable services to their requesters. This paper presents a scenario based evaluation on a set of existing and planned features of a certain service registry implementation in order to identify the architectural risks and trade-offs. The analysis applies the ATAM method and its SOA and REST related extensions to the service organization, related communication patterns and interfaces of the existing and new planned active features including service brokering. These are investigated from the quality point of view to identify the benefits and possible risks of such architectural decisions especially related to the new planned feature. The analysis exposed risks and trade-offs of the existing features andmost importantly new added value and design risks of the newfeature but also demonstrated applicability of the ATAM basedmethods and its additions.","PeriodicalId":312672,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Symposium on Service-Oriented System Engineering (SOSE)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Symposium on Service-Oriented System Engineering (SOSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOSE.2017.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Service registry's main responsibility on cloud andweb service platforms among cataloging the services is to manage service capability descriptions and deliver binding instructions of suitable services to their requesters. This paper presents a scenario based evaluation on a set of existing and planned features of a certain service registry implementation in order to identify the architectural risks and trade-offs. The analysis applies the ATAM method and its SOA and REST related extensions to the service organization, related communication patterns and interfaces of the existing and new planned active features including service brokering. These are investigated from the quality point of view to identify the benefits and possible risks of such architectural decisions especially related to the new planned feature. The analysis exposed risks and trade-offs of the existing features andmost importantly new added value and design risks of the newfeature but also demonstrated applicability of the ATAM basedmethods and its additions.
识别服务注册中心特性中的体系结构设计权衡
在对服务进行编目的云和web服务平台上,服务注册中心的主要职责是管理服务功能描述,并向其请求者提供合适服务的绑定说明。本文提出了一个基于对特定服务注册中心实现的一组现有和计划功能的评估的场景,以便识别体系结构风险和权衡。该分析将ATAM方法及其SOA和REST相关的扩展应用于服务组织、相关的通信模式和现有和新计划的活动功能(包括服务代理)的接口。从质量的角度对这些进行调查,以确定这种体系结构决策的好处和可能的风险,特别是与新计划的特性相关的决策。分析暴露了现有功能的风险和权衡,最重要的是新功能的新附加价值和设计风险,但也证明了基于ATAM的方法及其附加功能的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信