Evaluation of the performance of supervised and unsupervised Machine learning techniques for intrusion detection

Fernando Gutiérrez Pórtela, Florina Almenares Mendoza, Liliana Benavides
{"title":"Evaluation of the performance of supervised and unsupervised Machine learning techniques for intrusion detection","authors":"Fernando Gutiérrez Pórtela, Florina Almenares Mendoza, Liliana Benavides","doi":"10.1109/iCASAT48251.2019.9069538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"machine learning techniques are widely used in the research for intelligent solutions anomalies detection on different computers and communications systems, which have allowed to modernize the intrusion detection systems, to ensure data privacy. For that, this paper evaluates the performance of some supervised (i.e., KNN and SVM) and unsupervised (i.e., Isolation Forest and K-Means) algorithms, for intrusion detection, using data set UNSW-NB12. The results show that the supervised algorithm SVM gaussiana fine, obtained 92% in accuracy, indicating the ability to correctly classify normal and abnormal data. With regard to the unsupervised algorithms, the K-Means algorithm groups the data together correctly and allows the appropriate number of groups to be clearly defined; however, this data set is highly agglomerated. For Isolation Forest, despite being a robust algorithm for the separation of atypical values, it presented difficulty for it. Finally, it should be made clear that not all methods of detecting anomalies by distance work properly for all data sets.","PeriodicalId":178628,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Applied Science and Advanced Technology (iCASAT)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Applied Science and Advanced Technology (iCASAT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iCASAT48251.2019.9069538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

machine learning techniques are widely used in the research for intelligent solutions anomalies detection on different computers and communications systems, which have allowed to modernize the intrusion detection systems, to ensure data privacy. For that, this paper evaluates the performance of some supervised (i.e., KNN and SVM) and unsupervised (i.e., Isolation Forest and K-Means) algorithms, for intrusion detection, using data set UNSW-NB12. The results show that the supervised algorithm SVM gaussiana fine, obtained 92% in accuracy, indicating the ability to correctly classify normal and abnormal data. With regard to the unsupervised algorithms, the K-Means algorithm groups the data together correctly and allows the appropriate number of groups to be clearly defined; however, this data set is highly agglomerated. For Isolation Forest, despite being a robust algorithm for the separation of atypical values, it presented difficulty for it. Finally, it should be made clear that not all methods of detecting anomalies by distance work properly for all data sets.
有监督和无监督机器学习技术在入侵检测中的性能评估
机器学习技术广泛应用于不同计算机和通信系统异常检测的智能解决方案研究,使入侵检测系统现代化,以确保数据隐私。为此,本文利用UNSW-NB12数据集,对几种有监督(即KNN和SVM)和无监督(即隔离森林和K-Means)算法在入侵检测中的性能进行了评价。结果表明,监督算法SVM的准确率达到了92%,表明该算法能够正确分类正常和异常数据。对于无监督算法,K-Means算法将数据正确地分组在一起,并允许明确定义适当数量的组;然而,这个数据集是高度聚集的。对于隔离森林,尽管它是一种鲁棒的非典型值分离算法,但它存在困难。最后,应该明确的是,并非所有的距离异常检测方法都适用于所有数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信