Memory protection at option

EDCC-CARS Pub Date : 2010-04-27 DOI:10.1145/1772643.1772649
Michael Stilkerich, D. Lohmann, Wolfgang Schröder-Preikschat
{"title":"Memory protection at option","authors":"Michael Stilkerich, D. Lohmann, Wolfgang Schröder-Preikschat","doi":"10.1145/1772643.1772649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is hardware- and software-based memory protection that can improve the dependability of software systems. The two variants vary in the degree of protection and the amount and sites of overhead. The decision for a particular mechanism therefore highly depends on the application and deployment scenario.\n We propose a system suited for deeply embedded systems that allows to choose among no protection, software-based protection, hardware-based protection or a combination of the two without the need to change the application. In this paper, we present the current state of this work and support our claim that the best-suited memory protection type depends on the application by a preliminary evaluation.","PeriodicalId":221742,"journal":{"name":"EDCC-CARS","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDCC-CARS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1772643.1772649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

There is hardware- and software-based memory protection that can improve the dependability of software systems. The two variants vary in the degree of protection and the amount and sites of overhead. The decision for a particular mechanism therefore highly depends on the application and deployment scenario. We propose a system suited for deeply embedded systems that allows to choose among no protection, software-based protection, hardware-based protection or a combination of the two without the need to change the application. In this paper, we present the current state of this work and support our claim that the best-suited memory protection type depends on the application by a preliminary evaluation.
存储器保护选项
有基于硬件和软件的存储器保护,可以提高软件系统的可靠性。这两种变体在保护程度以及开销的数量和位置上有所不同。因此,特定机制的决策在很大程度上取决于应用程序和部署场景。我们提出了一种适合深度嵌入式系统的系统,允许在不保护,基于软件的保护,基于硬件的保护或两者的组合中进行选择,而无需更改应用程序。在本文中,我们介绍了这项工作的现状,并通过初步评估来支持我们的主张,即最适合的内存保护类型取决于应用程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信