Simulated stability of the AMOC during the Last Glacial Maximum under realistic boundary conditions

F. Pöppelmeier, J. Scheen, A. Jeltsch-Thömmes, T. Stocker
{"title":"Simulated stability of the AMOC during the Last Glacial Maximum\nunder realistic boundary conditions","authors":"F. Pöppelmeier, J. Scheen, A. Jeltsch-Thömmes, T. Stocker","doi":"10.5194/cp-2020-135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The response of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) to freshwater perturbations critically depends on its mean-state. Large swaths of icebergs melting in the North Atlantic during the last deglaciation constituted such perturbations, and thus can provide important constraints on the stability of the AMOC. Yet, the mean AMOC state during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), preceding the rapid disintegration of the ice-sheets during the deglaciation, as well as its response to these perturbations remain debated. Here we investigate the evolution of the AMOC responding to freshwater perturbations under improved LGM boundary conditions in the Bern3D intermediate complexity model. Particularly, we consider the effect of an open versus a closed Bering Strait. The vigorous and deep AMOC under these glacial boundary conditions, consistent with previous simulations with different models, reacts more strongly to North Atlantic freshwater forcings than under pre-industrial conditions. This increased sensitivity is mostly related to the closed Bering Strait that cuts off the freshwater escape route through the Arctic into the Pacific, thus facilitating faster accumulation of freshwater in the North Atlantic halting deep water formation. Proxy reconstructions of the LGM AMOC instead indicate a weaker and possibly shallower AMOC than today, in conflict with the particularly strong and deep circulation states coherently simulated with ocean circulation models for the LGM. Simulations with reduced North Atlantic deep water formation, as a consequence of potentially increased continental runoff from ice-sheet melt and imposed changes in the hydrological cycle, more closely resemble the overturning circulation inferred from proxies. These circulation states also show bistable behavior, where the AMOC does not recover after North Atlantic freshwater hosing. However, no AMOC states are found here that either comprise an extreme shoaling or vigorous and concurrent shallow overturning as previously proposed based on paleoceanographic data.","PeriodicalId":263057,"journal":{"name":"Climate of The Past Discussions","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate of The Past Discussions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2020-135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. The response of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) to freshwater perturbations critically depends on its mean-state. Large swaths of icebergs melting in the North Atlantic during the last deglaciation constituted such perturbations, and thus can provide important constraints on the stability of the AMOC. Yet, the mean AMOC state during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), preceding the rapid disintegration of the ice-sheets during the deglaciation, as well as its response to these perturbations remain debated. Here we investigate the evolution of the AMOC responding to freshwater perturbations under improved LGM boundary conditions in the Bern3D intermediate complexity model. Particularly, we consider the effect of an open versus a closed Bering Strait. The vigorous and deep AMOC under these glacial boundary conditions, consistent with previous simulations with different models, reacts more strongly to North Atlantic freshwater forcings than under pre-industrial conditions. This increased sensitivity is mostly related to the closed Bering Strait that cuts off the freshwater escape route through the Arctic into the Pacific, thus facilitating faster accumulation of freshwater in the North Atlantic halting deep water formation. Proxy reconstructions of the LGM AMOC instead indicate a weaker and possibly shallower AMOC than today, in conflict with the particularly strong and deep circulation states coherently simulated with ocean circulation models for the LGM. Simulations with reduced North Atlantic deep water formation, as a consequence of potentially increased continental runoff from ice-sheet melt and imposed changes in the hydrological cycle, more closely resemble the overturning circulation inferred from proxies. These circulation states also show bistable behavior, where the AMOC does not recover after North Atlantic freshwater hosing. However, no AMOC states are found here that either comprise an extreme shoaling or vigorous and concurrent shallow overturning as previously proposed based on paleoceanographic data.
末次冰期极大期AMOC在实际边界条件下的稳定性模拟
摘要大西洋经向翻转环流(AMOC)对淡水扰动的响应主要取决于其平均状态。在最后一次消冰期间,北大西洋的大片冰山融化构成了这种扰动,因此可以对AMOC的稳定性提供重要的限制。然而,末次盛冰期(末次盛冰期)冰盖快速崩解之前的平均AMOC状态及其对这些扰动的响应仍然存在争议。本文在Bern3D中等复杂度模型中,研究了改进LGM边界条件下AMOC对淡水扰动响应的演化。特别地,我们考虑了开放的白令海峡和封闭的白令海峡的影响。与以往不同模式的模拟结果一致,在这些冰川边界条件下旺盛而深厚的AMOC对北大西洋淡水强迫的反应比工业化前条件下更强烈。这种增加的敏感性主要与封闭的白令海峡有关,它切断了从北极进入太平洋的淡水逃生路线,从而促进了北大西洋淡水的更快积累,阻止了深水的形成。相反,LGM AMOC的替代重建表明AMOC比现在更弱,可能更浅,这与LGM海洋环流模式一致模拟的特别强和深的环流状态相冲突。由于冰盖融化可能增加大陆径流和强加的水文循环变化,北大西洋深水形成减少,模拟结果更接近于从代用物推断出的翻转环流。这些循环状态也表现出双稳态行为,在北大西洋淡水冲洗后AMOC不会恢复。然而,这里没有发现像以前根据古海洋学资料提出的那样,包括极端浅滩或剧烈和同时发生的浅层倾覆的AMOC状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信