Comparison of Methods for Calculation of Margins to Voltage Instability

O. Fosso, N. Flatabø, B. Hahavik, A. T. Holen
{"title":"Comparison of Methods for Calculation of Margins to Voltage Instability","authors":"O. Fosso, N. Flatabø, B. Hahavik, A. T. Holen","doi":"10.1109/APT.1993.686873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper describes and compares three methods for calculation of margins to voltage instability: a second order optimization formulation successive linearizations and sensitivity calculations fast decoupled load flow (FDLF) combined with curve fit They are all based on the static load flow equations, and voltage instability margins are given in terms of MW, MVAr or MVA load increase. The comparison focuses on: initiation requirements, flexibility to increase the load, load modelling, reactive power generation limits, speed, accuracy and convergence robustness. Also included are example calculations on a Norwegian 51 1 -bus system.","PeriodicalId":241767,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Joint International Power Conference Athens Power Tech,","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Joint International Power Conference Athens Power Tech,","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APT.1993.686873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

The paper describes and compares three methods for calculation of margins to voltage instability: a second order optimization formulation successive linearizations and sensitivity calculations fast decoupled load flow (FDLF) combined with curve fit They are all based on the static load flow equations, and voltage instability margins are given in terms of MW, MVAr or MVA load increase. The comparison focuses on: initiation requirements, flexibility to increase the load, load modelling, reactive power generation limits, speed, accuracy and convergence robustness. Also included are example calculations on a Norwegian 51 1 -bus system.
电压不稳定裕度计算方法的比较
本文介绍并比较了三种计算电压不稳定裕度的方法:二阶优化公式、连续线性化和灵敏度计算、快速解耦潮流(FDLF)与曲线拟合相结合,它们都是基于静态潮流方程,以MW、MVAr或MVA负荷增量为单位给出电压不稳定裕度。比较的重点是:启动要求、增加负荷的灵活性、负荷建模、无功发电限制、速度、准确性和收敛鲁棒性。还包括在挪威511总线系统上的示例计算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信