CWO Data Mining

M. J. Mohammadi-Aragh, D. Irby, R. Moorhead, R. Schumeyer
{"title":"CWO Data Mining","authors":"M. J. Mohammadi-Aragh, D. Irby, R. Moorhead, R. Schumeyer","doi":"10.1109/HPCMP-UGC.2006.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Navy Research Laboratory's Coastal Ocean Model (NCOM) is a realistic, large-scene simulation that runs daily and generates massive amounts of data. The data must be analyzed and/or reduced to provide pertinent information. This may be achieved through data mining by performing feature detection and/or region-of-interest detection. Data reduction using data mining techniques is not a new idea, especially when the objects of interest are ocean eddies. There are on the order of 20 methods to \"data mine\" for eddies. However, no one method has been tested on all models, few have been tried on multiple models or model types, and different methods require different data fields (e.g., salinity, temperature, horizontal velocity, vorticity). Our objective was to examine the most attractive eddy detection methods for NCOM and then determine which method provides the best results. We implemented and evaluated two eddy detection methods for NCOM data. The first is an algorithm created at Mississippi State University, which utilizes critical points in ocean flow. The algorithm was developed for the Navy Research Laboratory's Layered Ocean Model (NLOM) and performed well. The second algorithm is based on the Marr-Hildreth edge detection. We evaluated our results by comparing the detected eddy locations to eddies identified in ocean color from SeaWiFS in the northwestern Arabian Sea and Gulf of Oman","PeriodicalId":173959,"journal":{"name":"2006 HPCMP Users Group Conference (HPCMP-UGC'06)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 HPCMP Users Group Conference (HPCMP-UGC'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HPCMP-UGC.2006.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Navy Research Laboratory's Coastal Ocean Model (NCOM) is a realistic, large-scene simulation that runs daily and generates massive amounts of data. The data must be analyzed and/or reduced to provide pertinent information. This may be achieved through data mining by performing feature detection and/or region-of-interest detection. Data reduction using data mining techniques is not a new idea, especially when the objects of interest are ocean eddies. There are on the order of 20 methods to "data mine" for eddies. However, no one method has been tested on all models, few have been tried on multiple models or model types, and different methods require different data fields (e.g., salinity, temperature, horizontal velocity, vorticity). Our objective was to examine the most attractive eddy detection methods for NCOM and then determine which method provides the best results. We implemented and evaluated two eddy detection methods for NCOM data. The first is an algorithm created at Mississippi State University, which utilizes critical points in ocean flow. The algorithm was developed for the Navy Research Laboratory's Layered Ocean Model (NLOM) and performed well. The second algorithm is based on the Marr-Hildreth edge detection. We evaluated our results by comparing the detected eddy locations to eddies identified in ocean color from SeaWiFS in the northwestern Arabian Sea and Gulf of Oman
二、数据挖掘
海军研究实验室的海岸海洋模型(NCOM)是一种现实的、大场景的模拟,每天运行并产生大量数据。必须对数据进行分析和/或简化,以提供相关信息。这可以通过执行特征检测和/或兴趣区域检测的数据挖掘来实现。使用数据挖掘技术进行数据约简并不是一个新想法,特别是当感兴趣的对象是海洋涡流时。有大约20种方法可以“数据挖掘”涡旋。然而,没有一种方法在所有模型上进行过测试,很少有方法在多种模型或模式类型上进行过尝试,而且不同的方法需要不同的数据场(例如盐度、温度、水平速度、涡度)。我们的目的是研究最具吸引力的NCOM涡流检测方法,然后确定哪种方法提供最好的结果。我们实现并评估了两种用于NCOM数据的涡流检测方法。第一个是密西西比州立大学创建的算法,它利用了洋流的临界点。该算法是为海军研究实验室的分层海洋模型(NLOM)开发的,并且表现良好。第二种算法基于Marr-Hildreth边缘检测。我们通过将检测到的涡流位置与SeaWiFS在阿拉伯海西北部和阿曼湾的海洋颜色中识别的涡流进行比较来评估我们的结果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信