Comparison of nearest neighbour and neural network based classifications of patient's activity

Matti Pouke, Risto T. Honkanen
{"title":"Comparison of nearest neighbour and neural network based classifications of patient's activity","authors":"Matti Pouke, Risto T. Honkanen","doi":"10.4108/ICST.PERVASIVEHEALTH.2011.245980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comparison of 1-nearest neighbour (1-NN) and neural network based classification of patient activity. The data for classification was acquired from two 6 degree-of-freedom accelerometers deployed at the wrists of a patient. Instead of calculating statistical values, we studied the use of data samples acquired from 200ms time window. The best results were achieved with the 1-nearest neighbour algorithm. The overall accuracy of the 1-NN method was nearly 100%. The learning method for neural network used was the backpropagation with momentum. According to our experiments, the results of classification were more accurate with 1-NN in comparison with the result of neural network (93.4%).","PeriodicalId":444978,"journal":{"name":"2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/ICST.PERVASIVEHEALTH.2011.245980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison of 1-nearest neighbour (1-NN) and neural network based classification of patient activity. The data for classification was acquired from two 6 degree-of-freedom accelerometers deployed at the wrists of a patient. Instead of calculating statistical values, we studied the use of data samples acquired from 200ms time window. The best results were achieved with the 1-nearest neighbour algorithm. The overall accuracy of the 1-NN method was nearly 100%. The learning method for neural network used was the backpropagation with momentum. According to our experiments, the results of classification were more accurate with 1-NN in comparison with the result of neural network (93.4%).
基于最近邻和神经网络的患者活动分类的比较
本文比较了基于神经网络和最近邻的患者活动分类方法。分类数据是通过安装在患者手腕上的两个6自由度加速度计获得的。我们没有计算统计值,而是研究了从200ms时间窗获取的数据样本的使用。采用1近邻算法得到了最好的结果。1-NN方法的总体准确率接近100%。神经网络的学习方法是带动量的反向传播。根据我们的实验,与神经网络的分类结果相比,1-NN的分类准确率更高(93.4%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信