Lameness Localization in Dogs: An Exploratory Study of the Translation of the Equine Flexion Test to Canine Orthopaedics

VCOT Open Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1750036
Diane Grosjean, E. De Bakker, A. Mugnier, F. Verschooten, U. Rytz, F. Forterre, Y. Samoy, B. van Ryssen
{"title":"Lameness Localization in Dogs: An Exploratory Study of the Translation of the Equine Flexion Test to Canine Orthopaedics","authors":"Diane Grosjean, E. De Bakker, A. Mugnier, F. Verschooten, U. Rytz, F. Forterre, Y. Samoy, B. van Ryssen","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1750036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Objectives The aim of this study was to describe the method and feasibility of the flexion test (FT) as a diagnostic tool to localize lameness on dogs.\n Study Design Canine FT was designed and based on the FT routinely used on horses. In dogs, the test consisted in a flexion of a joint to its full range of motion for 1 minute. Eventual increased lameness was then evaluated. The gait was evaluated using a visual analogue scale. An increase in the lameness score compared with the baseline score was considered as a positive result.The method was described for every major joint of the appendicular skeleton and was evaluated in sound and lame dogs. To evaluate the feasibility, the FT was applied for 3 minutes in eight healthy dogs on all joints. On 27 clinically lame dogs, flexion was applied for 1 minute on the joints with a suspected pathology and on their contralateral side used as a control.\n Results The FT was feasible and well tolerated by the sound dogs on all joints and no positive results were recorded. On clinically lame dogs, lameness increased in 81.5% of dogs. These cases were afterwards diagnosed with an orthopaedic-related disorder and then defined as true positives. False negative results occurred in 18.5% of the lameness cases.\n Conclusion The FT is safe and easy to perform. It did not produce any false positive results. False negatives might occur in a minor number of cases, implying that a negative result does not exclude a joint pathology.","PeriodicalId":443672,"journal":{"name":"VCOT Open","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VCOT Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1750036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to describe the method and feasibility of the flexion test (FT) as a diagnostic tool to localize lameness on dogs. Study Design Canine FT was designed and based on the FT routinely used on horses. In dogs, the test consisted in a flexion of a joint to its full range of motion for 1 minute. Eventual increased lameness was then evaluated. The gait was evaluated using a visual analogue scale. An increase in the lameness score compared with the baseline score was considered as a positive result.The method was described for every major joint of the appendicular skeleton and was evaluated in sound and lame dogs. To evaluate the feasibility, the FT was applied for 3 minutes in eight healthy dogs on all joints. On 27 clinically lame dogs, flexion was applied for 1 minute on the joints with a suspected pathology and on their contralateral side used as a control. Results The FT was feasible and well tolerated by the sound dogs on all joints and no positive results were recorded. On clinically lame dogs, lameness increased in 81.5% of dogs. These cases were afterwards diagnosed with an orthopaedic-related disorder and then defined as true positives. False negative results occurred in 18.5% of the lameness cases. Conclusion The FT is safe and easy to perform. It did not produce any false positive results. False negatives might occur in a minor number of cases, implying that a negative result does not exclude a joint pathology.
犬跛行定位:马屈曲试验在犬矫形外科中的应用
目的本研究的目的是描述的方法和可行性的屈曲试验(FT)作为诊断工具,以定位跛足的狗。研究设计犬类傅立叶变换是在马常用傅立叶变换的基础上设计的。在狗身上,测试包括关节屈曲到其全范围运动1分钟。然后评估最终加重的跛行。采用视觉模拟量表评估步态。与基线评分相比,跛行评分的增加被认为是阳性结果。该方法描述了每个主要关节的附肢骨骼,并在健全和跛的狗进行了评估。为了评估其可行性,将FT应用于8只健康犬的所有关节3分钟。对27只临床跛行犬,在疑似病理的关节上屈曲1分钟,并在其对侧作为对照。结果健康犬对所有关节均具有良好的耐受性,无阳性结果。在临床跛狗中,81.5%的狗跛足增加。这些病例随后被诊断为骨科相关疾病,然后被定义为真阳性。18.5%的跛行病例出现假阴性结果。结论手术安全,操作简便。它没有产生任何假阳性结果。假阴性可能发生在少数情况下,这意味着阴性结果不排除关节病理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信