Surgical contraception of free-ranging female capybaras: Description and comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques.

Priscila R Yanai, M. Ferraro, Andressa F K T Lima, S. G. Cortopassi, Luis Claudio L C Silva
{"title":"Surgical contraception of free-ranging female capybaras: Description and comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques.","authors":"Priscila R Yanai, M. Ferraro, Andressa F K T Lima, S. G. Cortopassi, Luis Claudio L C Silva","doi":"10.1111/vsu.13806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo develop, describe, and evaluate 2 surgical techniques for contraception of free-ranging female capybaras.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nProspective study.\n\n\nANIMALS\nCadaveric (n = 3) and free-ranging female capybaras (n = 21).\n\n\nMETHODS\nPreliminary studies of surgical anatomy were performed on 3 capybara cadavers. Two different techniques for partial salpingectomy were evaluated in free-ranging female capybaras: bilateral minilaparotomy (LTG; n = 11) or bilateral laparoscopy (LCG; n = 10). Data concerning body weight, tubal ligation time, total surgical time, incision size, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were analyzed, as well as the clinical status and incisional healing 1 week postoperatively.\n\n\nRESULTS\nBody weight (P = .214), ligation time of the left uterine tube (P = .901), and total surgical time (P = .473) were similar between the experimental groups. The ligation time of the right uterine tube was shorter in the LCG group (P = .0463). In the LTG, no differences were observed between the sides regarding the incision size (P = .478). No major intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred in either group. One LCG procedure had to be converted to LTG due to technical issues. All skin incisions healed without complication.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nBoth procedures showed similar and satisfactory outcomes.\n\n\nCLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE\nThe proposed techniques may be a suitable alternative to conventional laparotomy for contraception of female capybaras, especially under field conditions.","PeriodicalId":123280,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary surgery : VS","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary surgery : VS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To develop, describe, and evaluate 2 surgical techniques for contraception of free-ranging female capybaras. STUDY DESIGN Prospective study. ANIMALS Cadaveric (n = 3) and free-ranging female capybaras (n = 21). METHODS Preliminary studies of surgical anatomy were performed on 3 capybara cadavers. Two different techniques for partial salpingectomy were evaluated in free-ranging female capybaras: bilateral minilaparotomy (LTG; n = 11) or bilateral laparoscopy (LCG; n = 10). Data concerning body weight, tubal ligation time, total surgical time, incision size, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were analyzed, as well as the clinical status and incisional healing 1 week postoperatively. RESULTS Body weight (P = .214), ligation time of the left uterine tube (P = .901), and total surgical time (P = .473) were similar between the experimental groups. The ligation time of the right uterine tube was shorter in the LCG group (P = .0463). In the LTG, no differences were observed between the sides regarding the incision size (P = .478). No major intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred in either group. One LCG procedure had to be converted to LTG due to technical issues. All skin incisions healed without complication. CONCLUSION Both procedures showed similar and satisfactory outcomes. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE The proposed techniques may be a suitable alternative to conventional laparotomy for contraception of female capybaras, especially under field conditions.
自由放养雌性水豚的手术避孕:开放和微创技术的描述和比较。
目的发展、描述和评价放养雌性水豚的2种手术避孕技术。研究设计前瞻性研究。动物(3只)和自由放养的雌性水豚(21只)。方法对3具水豚尸体进行初步的外科解剖研究。在自由放养的雌性水豚中,评估了两种不同的输卵管部分切除术技术:双侧小切口(LTG);n = 11)或双侧腹腔镜(LCG;n = 10)。分析患者体重、结扎时间、手术总时间、切口大小、术中术后并发症及术后1周临床情况及切口愈合情况。结果两组患者体重(P = .214)、左输卵管结扎时间(P = .901)、总手术时间(P = .473)差异无统计学意义。LCG组右输卵管结扎时间更短(P = 0.0463)。在LTG中,两侧切口大小没有差异(P = .478)。两组均未发生重大术中或术后并发症。由于技术问题,一个LCG程序必须转换为LTG。所有皮肤切口均愈合,无并发症。结论两种治疗方法疗效相似,均满意。临床意义:该技术可作为传统剖腹手术的替代方法,用于雌性水豚的避孕,特别是在野外条件下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信