Assessment of Physico-chemical and Bacteriological Quality of Drinking Water Sources in Kakamega County, Kenya

Ernest Othieno Odwori, Jacob Wanambacha Wakhungu
{"title":"Assessment of Physico-chemical and Bacteriological Quality of Drinking Water Sources in Kakamega County, Kenya","authors":"Ernest Othieno Odwori, Jacob Wanambacha Wakhungu","doi":"10.9734/ajee/2023/v20i1432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Water-borne diseases still present a major health burden in Africa. Large segments of the rural population here have no access to potable water. This study has been designed to assess the physico-chemical and bacteriological quality of drinking water sources in the study area. The study was conducted in Kakamega county covering the twelve sub-counties of Likuyani, Lugari, Malava, Navakholo, Lurambi, Ikolomani, Shinyalu, Mumias East, Mumias West, Matungu, Butere and Khwisero. Socio-demographic characteristics of the study populations were captured using a structured pre-tested questionnaire. The Most Probable Number (MPN) method was used to determine the abundance of Total coliforms and Escherichia coli (E. coli) in the water samples collected. Physico-chemical analyses (Temperature, pH, Electrical conductivity, Total dissolved solids and Dissolved oxygen) were carried out. Free residual chlorine was determined by colorimetric method with DPD chlorine tablets. The analyses were conducted following guidelines of American Public Health Association and WHO. Only 17% (68/400) of the study population had access to piped water in the study area. Waste management practices of the localities was found poor as more than 62 % (248/400) of the respondents dispose waste materials in open fields. All drinking water sources investigated were contaminated with Total coliforms. There was a wide variation in Total coliforms and E. coli. Total coliform counts ranged from 0.0 - 3652.5 cfu/100 ml whereas E. coli ranged from 0.0 - 33.0 cfu/100 ml. Both Rivers/streams and unprotected dug wells recorded the highest number of Total coliforms and E. coli. Piped water, Rainwater collection and Boreholes recorded the lowest number of Total coliforms and E. coli. E. coli counts in most drinking water sources investigated exceeded the maximum permissible limits set by WHO/KEBS, implying that they are not safe for household applications without prior treatment. The results indicate that protected drinking water sources (piped water, boreholes, protected dug wells and protected springs) are subjected to a high level of fecal contamination in the study area. Construction flaws on casing, concrete covers, fences, diversion ditches, and protection of springs' eyes and other plumbing accessories could be one of the causes. Protected water sources may become contaminated for other reasons, such as a lack of frequent surveillance, disinfection, and correct maintenance. Poor sanitation practices, a lack of hygiene education, poor supervision and maintenance, and inconsistent water point disinfection can all be blamed for the high levels of E. coli. The recorded temperature and pH ranged between 19.9–27.2°C and 4.8 - 9.1, respectively. Turbidity and Electric conductivity of the water samples ranged, respectively, between 0.43–467.02 NTU and 18.7–510.7 μS/cm. Residual chlorine in piped water showed a range of 0.06-1.2 ppm. In addition, Total dissolved solids were found to be between 20.1 and 639.2 mg/l; whereas Dissolved oxygen ranged from 2.2- 15.4 mg/l. The results of the current investigation showed that some bacteriological and physico-chemical parameters of the various water sources had values above the maximum permissible limits advised by WHO/KEBS. The Water sector stakeholders in the area should put in place proper intervention measures which include raising public awareness on the water quality of drinking water sources and enhancing the current infrastructure in order to reduce any potential health hazards.","PeriodicalId":253461,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Environment & Ecology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Environment & Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajee/2023/v20i1432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Water-borne diseases still present a major health burden in Africa. Large segments of the rural population here have no access to potable water. This study has been designed to assess the physico-chemical and bacteriological quality of drinking water sources in the study area. The study was conducted in Kakamega county covering the twelve sub-counties of Likuyani, Lugari, Malava, Navakholo, Lurambi, Ikolomani, Shinyalu, Mumias East, Mumias West, Matungu, Butere and Khwisero. Socio-demographic characteristics of the study populations were captured using a structured pre-tested questionnaire. The Most Probable Number (MPN) method was used to determine the abundance of Total coliforms and Escherichia coli (E. coli) in the water samples collected. Physico-chemical analyses (Temperature, pH, Electrical conductivity, Total dissolved solids and Dissolved oxygen) were carried out. Free residual chlorine was determined by colorimetric method with DPD chlorine tablets. The analyses were conducted following guidelines of American Public Health Association and WHO. Only 17% (68/400) of the study population had access to piped water in the study area. Waste management practices of the localities was found poor as more than 62 % (248/400) of the respondents dispose waste materials in open fields. All drinking water sources investigated were contaminated with Total coliforms. There was a wide variation in Total coliforms and E. coli. Total coliform counts ranged from 0.0 - 3652.5 cfu/100 ml whereas E. coli ranged from 0.0 - 33.0 cfu/100 ml. Both Rivers/streams and unprotected dug wells recorded the highest number of Total coliforms and E. coli. Piped water, Rainwater collection and Boreholes recorded the lowest number of Total coliforms and E. coli. E. coli counts in most drinking water sources investigated exceeded the maximum permissible limits set by WHO/KEBS, implying that they are not safe for household applications without prior treatment. The results indicate that protected drinking water sources (piped water, boreholes, protected dug wells and protected springs) are subjected to a high level of fecal contamination in the study area. Construction flaws on casing, concrete covers, fences, diversion ditches, and protection of springs' eyes and other plumbing accessories could be one of the causes. Protected water sources may become contaminated for other reasons, such as a lack of frequent surveillance, disinfection, and correct maintenance. Poor sanitation practices, a lack of hygiene education, poor supervision and maintenance, and inconsistent water point disinfection can all be blamed for the high levels of E. coli. The recorded temperature and pH ranged between 19.9–27.2°C and 4.8 - 9.1, respectively. Turbidity and Electric conductivity of the water samples ranged, respectively, between 0.43–467.02 NTU and 18.7–510.7 μS/cm. Residual chlorine in piped water showed a range of 0.06-1.2 ppm. In addition, Total dissolved solids were found to be between 20.1 and 639.2 mg/l; whereas Dissolved oxygen ranged from 2.2- 15.4 mg/l. The results of the current investigation showed that some bacteriological and physico-chemical parameters of the various water sources had values above the maximum permissible limits advised by WHO/KEBS. The Water sector stakeholders in the area should put in place proper intervention measures which include raising public awareness on the water quality of drinking water sources and enhancing the current infrastructure in order to reduce any potential health hazards.
肯尼亚卡卡梅加县饮用水源理化和细菌学质量评价
水媒疾病仍然是非洲的一个主要健康负担。这里的大部分农村人口无法获得饮用水。本研究旨在评价研究区饮用水源的理化和细菌学质量。这项研究是在卡卡梅加县进行的,涵盖了利库亚尼、卢加里、马拉瓦、纳瓦克霍罗、卢兰比、伊科洛马尼、新亚卢、穆尼亚东、穆尼亚西、马通古、Butere和赫维塞罗等12个县。研究人群的社会人口学特征采用结构化的预测试问卷。采用最可能数(MPN)法测定水样中总大肠菌群和大肠杆菌的丰度。进行了理化分析(温度、pH、电导率、总溶解固体和溶解氧)。用DPD氯片比色法测定游离余氯。这些分析是按照美国公共卫生协会和世界卫生组织的指导方针进行的。在研究区域,只有17%(68/400)的研究人口能够获得自来水。超过62%(248/400)的回答者将废弃物弃置在露天场地,发现地方废弃物管理实践较差。调查的所有饮用水源均被Total大肠菌群污染。总大肠菌群和大肠杆菌存在较大差异。大肠菌群总数在0.0 ~ 3652.5 cfu/100 ml之间,大肠杆菌总数在0.0 ~ 33.0 cfu/100 ml之间。河流/溪流和未受保护的挖井中大肠菌群总数和大肠杆菌数量最高。自来水、雨水收集和钻孔中大肠菌群和大肠杆菌的总数最低。在调查的大多数饮用水源中,大肠杆菌数量超过了世卫组织/KEBS规定的最大允许限量,这意味着未经事先处理的饮用水源不安全。结果表明,研究区受保护的饮用水源(自来水、钻孔、受保护的挖井和受保护的泉水)受到高水平的粪便污染。套管、混凝土外壳、围栏、导流沟、弹簧眼保护和其他管道配件上的施工缺陷可能是原因之一。受保护的水源可能因其他原因而受到污染,例如缺乏频繁的监测、消毒和正确的维护。恶劣的卫生习惯、缺乏卫生教育、不良的监督和维护以及不一致的供水点消毒都是造成大肠杆菌高水平的原因。记录的温度和pH值分别在19.9-27.2℃和4.8 - 9.1℃之间。水样浊度和电导率分别为0.43 ~ 467.02 NTU和18.7 ~ 510.7 μS/cm。自来水中余氯含量为0.06-1.2 ppm。总溶解固形物含量在20.1 ~ 639.2 mg/l之间;而溶解氧为2.2- 15.4 mg/l。目前的调查结果表明,各种水源的一些细菌和物理化学参数的值超过了世卫组织/KEBS建议的最大允许限度。该地区的水部门利益攸关方应采取适当的干预措施,包括提高公众对饮用水源水质的认识,加强现有基础设施,以减少任何潜在的健康危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信