Comparison of two volume integral equation formulations for solving electromagnetic scattering by inhomogeneous dielectric objects

Caicheng Lu, P. Yla-Oijala, M. Taskinen, J. Sarvas
{"title":"Comparison of two volume integral equation formulations for solving electromagnetic scattering by inhomogeneous dielectric objects","authors":"Caicheng Lu, P. Yla-Oijala, M. Taskinen, J. Sarvas","doi":"10.1109/APS.2009.5172078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presented two formulations of the electric field volume integral equation, and discussed the use of two different types of volume basis functions in the representation of the volume current. In conclusion, for the two types of volume basis functions, the solution accuracies are of the same order as long as the numbers of basis functions are comparable. The numbers of iterations of the C-type basis function are generally smaller than that of the D-type basis functions if the initial is a zero vector. For multiple incident angles, the D-type basis case needs slightly less number of iterations when the initial solution is predicted from the solution of the previous incident angle.","PeriodicalId":213759,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APS.2009.5172078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

This paper presented two formulations of the electric field volume integral equation, and discussed the use of two different types of volume basis functions in the representation of the volume current. In conclusion, for the two types of volume basis functions, the solution accuracies are of the same order as long as the numbers of basis functions are comparable. The numbers of iterations of the C-type basis function are generally smaller than that of the D-type basis functions if the initial is a zero vector. For multiple incident angles, the D-type basis case needs slightly less number of iterations when the initial solution is predicted from the solution of the previous incident angle.
求解非均匀介质物体电磁散射的两种体积积分方程的比较
本文给出了电场体积积分方程的两种形式,并讨论了两种不同类型的体积基函数在体积电流表示中的应用。综上所述,对于两种体积基函数,只要基函数的个数具有可比性,解的精度都是同一阶的。当初始向量为零向量时,c型基函数的迭代次数一般小于d型基函数。对于多个入射角,从前一个入射角的解预测初始解时,d型基情形所需的迭代次数略少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信