The Fluid Touristic Lens: Young Chinese Adults’ Interpretive Preferences in Nature-Based Attractions

Siqi Lu, K. Hughes, Muchazondida Mkono
{"title":"The Fluid Touristic Lens: Young Chinese Adults’ Interpretive Preferences in Nature-Based Attractions","authors":"Siqi Lu, K. Hughes, Muchazondida Mkono","doi":"10.1177/10925872221121078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In China, interpretation of natural attractions usually includes references to traditional poems, artwork, legends, and stories. Recently, researchers have questioned whether this approach resonates with younger audiences. Guided by the interpretive paradigm, this exploratory study used focus group interviews to explore young Chinese adults’ perceptions, views, and preferences of interpretation at Chinese and Australian nature-based tourist attractions. Findings provide corroborating evidence for subtle generational shifts. When in China, participants preferred interpretation that used traditional Chinese poems, legends, and stories, but questioned the authenticity of guides’ interpretive narratives; when in Australia, they preferred quintessentially Australian stories that provide insights into issues of cultural and scientific importance. A preoccupation with personal safety, particularly in Australia, also emerged. Findings demonstrate the fluidity of the Chinese visitor lens—participants applied different lenses to interpret familiar versus unfamiliar landscapes. Implications for the design of interpretive experiences for Chinese visitors are discussed.","PeriodicalId":364431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpretation Research","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpretation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10925872221121078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In China, interpretation of natural attractions usually includes references to traditional poems, artwork, legends, and stories. Recently, researchers have questioned whether this approach resonates with younger audiences. Guided by the interpretive paradigm, this exploratory study used focus group interviews to explore young Chinese adults’ perceptions, views, and preferences of interpretation at Chinese and Australian nature-based tourist attractions. Findings provide corroborating evidence for subtle generational shifts. When in China, participants preferred interpretation that used traditional Chinese poems, legends, and stories, but questioned the authenticity of guides’ interpretive narratives; when in Australia, they preferred quintessentially Australian stories that provide insights into issues of cultural and scientific importance. A preoccupation with personal safety, particularly in Australia, also emerged. Findings demonstrate the fluidity of the Chinese visitor lens—participants applied different lenses to interpret familiar versus unfamiliar landscapes. Implications for the design of interpretive experiences for Chinese visitors are discussed.
流动的旅游镜头:中国年轻人对自然景点的解释偏好
在中国,对自然景观的解释通常包括参考传统的诗歌、艺术品、传说和故事。最近,研究人员质疑这种方法是否能引起年轻观众的共鸣。在解释性范式的指导下,本探索性研究采用焦点小组访谈的方式探讨了中国年轻人在中国和澳大利亚自然旅游景点对口译的看法、观点和偏好。研究结果为微妙的代际变化提供了确凿的证据。当在中国时,参与者更喜欢使用中国传统诗歌、传说和故事的解说,但质疑导游解说叙述的真实性;在澳大利亚时,他们更喜欢典型的澳大利亚故事,这些故事能提供对文化和科学问题的见解。人们也开始关注人身安全,尤其是在澳大利亚。研究结果显示了中国游客视角的流动性——参与者使用不同的视角来解读熟悉和不熟悉的风景。讨论了对中国游客的解释性体验设计的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信