Some Tasks of Minjung Theology in the Age of Globalization

Kang, Won-don
{"title":"Some Tasks of Minjung Theology in the Age of Globalization","authors":"Kang, Won-don","doi":"10.26590/madang..22.201412.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article I ask whether the basic concerns of minjung theology that were articulated within the political boundary of a national state are still significant in the age of globalization. If we can answer this question positively, then we have to ask how to elaborate and materialize those concerns in post-national constellations. With such a question in mind, first, I explain three current trends of minjung theology, those are, 1) critical and creative succession to the achievements of the first-generation minjung theologians, 2) post-modern reconstruction of minjung theology, and 3) theological-missiological discourse on the reality of minjung and their liberation praxis. Second, I characterize the process of globalization as spread of capitalism with insane plunder and oppression and suggest that minjung theology in search for an alternative world should again integrate Marx’s critique of political economy into theological reflection. Third, I highlight the subject status of minjung as one of the most significant themes of minjung theology. I distinguish three paradigms for the subject status of minjung from one another, namely, socio-biographical paradigm, class struggle paradigm, and network movement paradigm. In the age of globalization I accept that social movements must shape networks, but accentuate that it is empty to separate the issues of gender, race, and generation from class issue, while it is blind to reduce such cultural issues to the issue of class. Fourth, I deal with how to conceptualize the question of nation (in Korean ‘minjok’) in the age of globalization. I pay attention to the danger of considering nation as substance and suggest that minjung theology should make an open approach to the question of nation. Only with such a premise minjung theology can contribute to shaping a peace nation on the way to national reunification. Fifth and finally I suggest key agendas that minjung theology should engage in the age of globalization: economic democracy, welfare, global citizenship and property order reform..","PeriodicalId":130336,"journal":{"name":"Madang: Journal of Contextual Theology","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Madang: Journal of Contextual Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26590/madang..22.201412.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the article I ask whether the basic concerns of minjung theology that were articulated within the political boundary of a national state are still significant in the age of globalization. If we can answer this question positively, then we have to ask how to elaborate and materialize those concerns in post-national constellations. With such a question in mind, first, I explain three current trends of minjung theology, those are, 1) critical and creative succession to the achievements of the first-generation minjung theologians, 2) post-modern reconstruction of minjung theology, and 3) theological-missiological discourse on the reality of minjung and their liberation praxis. Second, I characterize the process of globalization as spread of capitalism with insane plunder and oppression and suggest that minjung theology in search for an alternative world should again integrate Marx’s critique of political economy into theological reflection. Third, I highlight the subject status of minjung as one of the most significant themes of minjung theology. I distinguish three paradigms for the subject status of minjung from one another, namely, socio-biographical paradigm, class struggle paradigm, and network movement paradigm. In the age of globalization I accept that social movements must shape networks, but accentuate that it is empty to separate the issues of gender, race, and generation from class issue, while it is blind to reduce such cultural issues to the issue of class. Fourth, I deal with how to conceptualize the question of nation (in Korean ‘minjok’) in the age of globalization. I pay attention to the danger of considering nation as substance and suggest that minjung theology should make an open approach to the question of nation. Only with such a premise minjung theology can contribute to shaping a peace nation on the way to national reunification. Fifth and finally I suggest key agendas that minjung theology should engage in the age of globalization: economic democracy, welfare, global citizenship and property order reform..
全球化时代民宗神学的若干任务
在这篇文章中,我提出了一个问题,即在民族国家的政治边界内阐述的民宗神学的基本关切在全球化时代是否仍然重要。如果我们能够积极地回答这个问题,那么我们就必须问如何在后国家星座中详细说明和实现这些关切。带着这样一个问题,首先,我将解释当前民jung神学的三个趋势,即1)对第一代民jung神学家成就的批判性和创造性继承,2)民jung神学的后现代重建,以及3)对民jung现实及其解放实践的神学-宣教话语。其次,我将全球化的过程描述为资本主义的疯狂掠夺和压迫的传播,并建议寻找另一个世界的民jung神学应该再次将马克思对政治经济学的批判融入神学反思中。第三,我强调民宗的主体地位是民宗神学最重要的主题之一。笔者区分了民jung主体地位的三种范式,即社会-传记范式、阶级斗争范式和网络运动范式。在全球化时代,我承认社会运动必须塑造网络,但我强调,将性别、种族、世代问题与阶级问题分开是空洞的,而将这些文化问题归结为阶级问题是盲目的。第四,我将讨论在全球化时代如何概念化民族问题(韩语“minjok”)。我注意到将民族视为实质的危险,并建议民宗神学应该对民族问题采取开放的态度。只有在这样的前提下,民宗神学才能在实现统一的道路上为和平国家的形成做出贡献。第五,也是最后,我提出了民宗神学在全球化时代应该参与的关键议程:经济民主、福利、全球公民和财产秩序改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信