Post-Failure Recovery Strategies for Metrorail Transit Networks With Washington D.C. As a Case Study

Yalda Saadat, Yanjie Zhang, Dongming Zhang, B. Ayyub, Hong-wei Huang
{"title":"Post-Failure Recovery Strategies for Metrorail Transit Networks With Washington D.C. As a Case Study","authors":"Yalda Saadat, Yanjie Zhang, Dongming Zhang, B. Ayyub, Hong-wei Huang","doi":"10.1115/IMECE2018-87471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Metro-Rail transit systems are large-scale networks in numerous modern urban areas that play prominent direct and supportive roles in providing efficient mobility for sustaining communities and local economies. Any event leading to failure of a metro-rail network could have serious societal consequences, such as dramatic effect on the safety and wellbeing of commuters in addition to direct and indirect costs from its diminished performance that lead to resilience loss. Potential performance losses might exhibit complexity and pose a challenge for measurement and prediction. Hence, measuring the resilience of such a network enables its efficient enhancement in a cost-effective manner. Enhancing resilience highly depends on identifying recovery strategies with special attention not only to restoring connectedness but also on reducing associated failure and recovery costs. An effective recovery strategy must demonstrate rapid optimal restoration of a disrupted system while minimizing the cost of the disruption. The objective of this paper is to identify effective recovery strategies to reduce the performance loss and to minimize the total cost of a network during and after a disruptive event, using Washington D.C. Metro with its 91 stations and 140 links as a case study. Method of measuring performance loss in this paper, illustrates that the best recovery sequence typically reflects the order of components ranked based on their degree of vulnerability in the network. Also, the proposed cost model provides a basis to decision makers to identify an optimal recovery strategy according to both paramount recovery sequence and minimum cost consideration.","PeriodicalId":201128,"journal":{"name":"Volume 13: Design, Reliability, Safety, and Risk","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 13: Design, Reliability, Safety, and Risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2018-87471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Metro-Rail transit systems are large-scale networks in numerous modern urban areas that play prominent direct and supportive roles in providing efficient mobility for sustaining communities and local economies. Any event leading to failure of a metro-rail network could have serious societal consequences, such as dramatic effect on the safety and wellbeing of commuters in addition to direct and indirect costs from its diminished performance that lead to resilience loss. Potential performance losses might exhibit complexity and pose a challenge for measurement and prediction. Hence, measuring the resilience of such a network enables its efficient enhancement in a cost-effective manner. Enhancing resilience highly depends on identifying recovery strategies with special attention not only to restoring connectedness but also on reducing associated failure and recovery costs. An effective recovery strategy must demonstrate rapid optimal restoration of a disrupted system while minimizing the cost of the disruption. The objective of this paper is to identify effective recovery strategies to reduce the performance loss and to minimize the total cost of a network during and after a disruptive event, using Washington D.C. Metro with its 91 stations and 140 links as a case study. Method of measuring performance loss in this paper, illustrates that the best recovery sequence typically reflects the order of components ranked based on their degree of vulnerability in the network. Also, the proposed cost model provides a basis to decision makers to identify an optimal recovery strategy according to both paramount recovery sequence and minimum cost consideration.
地铁交通网络故障后恢复策略——以华盛顿特区为例
地铁轨道交通系统是众多现代城市地区的大型网络,在为维持社区和当地经济提供有效的流动性方面发挥着突出的直接和支持性作用。任何导致地铁网络故障的事件都可能产生严重的社会后果,例如对通勤者安全和福祉的巨大影响,以及其性能下降导致弹性丧失的直接和间接成本。潜在的性能损失可能表现出复杂性,并对测量和预测构成挑战。因此,测量这种网络的弹性能够以经济有效的方式有效地增强它。增强弹性在很大程度上取决于确定恢复策略,不仅要特别关注恢复连通性,还要关注减少相关故障和恢复成本。一个有效的恢复策略必须能够快速、最佳地恢复中断系统,同时使中断的成本最小化。本文的目的是确定有效的恢复策略,以减少性能损失,并将网络在中断事件期间和之后的总成本降至最低,并以华盛顿特区地铁的91个车站和140条线路为例进行研究。本文的性能损失度量方法表明,最佳恢复顺序通常反映了组件在网络中根据其脆弱程度排序的顺序。提出的成本模型为决策者根据最大开采顺序和最小成本考虑确定最优开采策略提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信