Social or Highly Competitive Europe? EU Law Solution to Conflict of Social Security and Competition Law

V. Šmejkal
{"title":"Social or Highly Competitive Europe? EU Law Solution to Conflict of Social Security and Competition Law","authors":"V. Šmejkal","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2673665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 1990s when liberalization and deregulation processes first opened the social security field to market forces, the EU competition law has had to cope with the situations of clash between values of social welfare and free competition. In the post-crisis period the European Union wants and needs to be more socially responsive, as the strengthening of social justice and social rights, the fight against poverty and social exclusion has become the key to political legitimacy of the European integration as well as of its Member States. A question hence arises how the call for a more social EU would cohabit with the free and undistorted competition. The paper tries to remedy on the fact that the EU so far has no accepted methodology of how to integrate public policy considerations in competition decisions. After sketching out such a methodology based on the CJEU’s pre-Lisbon case law, the present analysis deals with the post-Lisbon developments inquiring whether the CJEU is paying now more consideration to social security measures.","PeriodicalId":330803,"journal":{"name":"The Lawyer Quarterly","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lawyer Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2673665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since 1990s when liberalization and deregulation processes first opened the social security field to market forces, the EU competition law has had to cope with the situations of clash between values of social welfare and free competition. In the post-crisis period the European Union wants and needs to be more socially responsive, as the strengthening of social justice and social rights, the fight against poverty and social exclusion has become the key to political legitimacy of the European integration as well as of its Member States. A question hence arises how the call for a more social EU would cohabit with the free and undistorted competition. The paper tries to remedy on the fact that the EU so far has no accepted methodology of how to integrate public policy considerations in competition decisions. After sketching out such a methodology based on the CJEU’s pre-Lisbon case law, the present analysis deals with the post-Lisbon developments inquiring whether the CJEU is paying now more consideration to social security measures.
社会还是高度竞争的欧洲?欧盟法律对社会保障与竞争法冲突的解决
自自由化和放松管制的过程首次将社会保障领域开放给市场力量以来,欧盟竞争法不得不应对社会福利价值观与自由竞争价值观之间的冲突局面。在危机后时期,欧洲联盟希望并需要对社会作出更积极的反应,因为加强社会正义和社会权利、与贫穷和社会排斥作斗争已成为欧洲一体化及其成员国政治合法性的关键。因此,一个问题出现了,要求一个更社会化的欧盟如何与自由和不扭曲的竞争共存。本文试图弥补这一事实,即欧盟迄今为止没有公认的方法,如何将公共政策考虑纳入竞争决策。在以欧洲法院里斯本条约之前的判例法为基础勾勒出这种方法之后,本文分析了里斯本条约之后的发展,探讨欧洲法院现在是否更多地考虑社会保障措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信