A Combination of multiple imputation and principal component analysis to handle missing value with arbitrary pattern

Novita Anindita, H. A. Nugroho, T. B. Adji
{"title":"A Combination of multiple imputation and principal component analysis to handle missing value with arbitrary pattern","authors":"Novita Anindita, H. A. Nugroho, T. B. Adji","doi":"10.1109/INAES.2017.8068537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hepatitis is one of the major health problems which can progress to chronic hepatitis and cancer. Currently, computer based diagnosis is commonly use among medical examination. The diagnosis has been examined by using the disease dataset as a reference to make the decisions. However, the dataset was incomplete because it contained many instances containing missing values. This situation can lead the results of the analysis to be biased. One method of handling missing values is Multiple Imputation. Hepatitis dataset has an arbitrary pattern of missing values. This pattern can be handled by using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and Fully Conditional Specification (FCS) as Multiple Imputation algorithms. The research conducted an experiment to compare combinations of Multiple Imputations algorithm and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) as instance selection. Instance selection applied to reduce data by selecting variables that contribute greatly to the dataset. The goal was to improve the accuracy of the analysis on data which had missing values with the arbitrary pattern. The results showed that FCS-PCA is the best performance with the higher accuracy (98.80%) and the lowest error rate (0.0116).","PeriodicalId":382919,"journal":{"name":"2017 7th International Annual Engineering Seminar (InAES)","volume":"159 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 7th International Annual Engineering Seminar (InAES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INAES.2017.8068537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Hepatitis is one of the major health problems which can progress to chronic hepatitis and cancer. Currently, computer based diagnosis is commonly use among medical examination. The diagnosis has been examined by using the disease dataset as a reference to make the decisions. However, the dataset was incomplete because it contained many instances containing missing values. This situation can lead the results of the analysis to be biased. One method of handling missing values is Multiple Imputation. Hepatitis dataset has an arbitrary pattern of missing values. This pattern can be handled by using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and Fully Conditional Specification (FCS) as Multiple Imputation algorithms. The research conducted an experiment to compare combinations of Multiple Imputations algorithm and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) as instance selection. Instance selection applied to reduce data by selecting variables that contribute greatly to the dataset. The goal was to improve the accuracy of the analysis on data which had missing values with the arbitrary pattern. The results showed that FCS-PCA is the best performance with the higher accuracy (98.80%) and the lowest error rate (0.0116).
采用多重插值和主成分分析相结合的方法处理任意模式的缺失值
肝炎是主要的健康问题之一,可发展为慢性肝炎和癌症。目前,医学检查中普遍采用计算机诊断。通过使用疾病数据集作为决策参考,对诊断进行了检查。然而,数据集是不完整的,因为它包含许多包含缺失值的实例。这种情况可能导致分析结果有偏差。处理缺失值的一种方法是多重输入。肝炎数据集具有任意缺失值模式。这种模式可以通过使用马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)和完全条件规范(FCS)作为多重输入算法来处理。本研究对多重Imputations算法与主成分分析(PCA)组合作为实例选择进行了实验比较。实例选择应用于通过选择对数据集贡献很大的变量来减少数据。目标是提高对任意模式下缺失值的数据的分析准确性。结果表明,FCS-PCA的准确率最高(98.80%),错误率最低(0.0116)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信